Taylor v Midland Bank Trust Company Ltd (No.2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1999 |
| Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
14 cases
-
Highways England Company Ltd v B.G. Rodwell Ltd (First Defendant) Robert Cheadle (Second Defendant) Allianz Insurance Plc (Third Defendant)
...summary judgment. These are well known but the following points may be made (i) It is well established by the decision in Taylor v. Midland Bank Trust Co. Ltd (No.2) [2002] WTLR 95 that, in a suitable case, an application for summary judgment may be combined with an application to strike ou......
-
Walker v Stones
...not such conduct amounted to dishonesty within the meaning of clauses 14 and 15 of the Bacchus Trust Deed. In the recent case of Taylor v. Midland Bank Trust Co 21st July 1999 (unreported) Stuart-Smith LJ pointed out (at p. 12 of the transcript): "… it is not sufficient to look and see whet......
-
Andrew Kasongo v CRBE Ltd
...Part 24. Moroney v Anglo-European College of Chiropractice [2009] EWCA Civ 1560; and see, Taylor v Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd (No.2) [2002] WTLR 95. However, in Ministry of Defence v AB [2010] EWCA Civ 1317; [2011] 117 BMLR. 101, summary judgment sought in respect of test cases in group li......
-
Bee v Jenson
...court may treat an application under r.3.4(2)(a) as if it was an application under Pt 24; see Taylor v Midland Bank Trust Co Ltd (No 2) [2002] WTLR 95.” 5 Part 24.2 provides that: “The court may give summary judgment against a claimant or defendant on the whole of a claim or on a particular......
Request a trial to view additional results