TCB Ltd v Gray

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Year1986
Date1986
CourtChancery Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Smith (Geoffrey) v Henniker-Major & Company
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 22 July 2002
    ...company law, see Edwards at p.35). 24 Section 9(1) of the 1972 Act was considered by Sir Nicolas Browne-Wilkinson V-C in TCB Ltd v Gray [1986] Ch 621. In that case Mr Gray, the principal shareholder in two private companies of which he was a director, was seeking to avoid liability as a gu......
  • Shah v Shah
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 10 April 2001
    ...provision, its purpose and the social policy behind it when deciding whether an estoppel was to be allowed. In TCB Ltd v GrayELR ((1986) Ch 621, 634) the court was willing to allow an estoppel, when the existing requirement to establish that a deed had been sealed was not satisfied, and tha......
  • William Grant And Sons Limited And Others V. Mercer Limited
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 9 April 2010
    ...with the first pursuer, and was entitled to rely on the deeming provision of the section. Reference was also made to TCB Limited v Gray [1986] 1 Ch. 621. The pursuers in the present case have not averred that the defender was responsible for the internal regulation of the first pursuer to e......
  • 872899 Ontario Inc. v. Iacovoni, (1998) 112 O.A.C. 280 (CA)
    • Canada
    • Ontario Court of Appeal (Ontario)
    • 3 July 1998
    ...475 (C.A.). Yet the latest English authority on the subject, of which I am aware, shows no such inclination. In T.C.B. Ltd. v. Gray , [1986] Ch. 621; [1986] 1 All E.R. 587; [1986] 2 W.L.R. 517 (Ch. D.), Sir Nicolas Brown-Wilkinson, V.C., had to decide whether a power of attorney was execute......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Consideration and Form
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books The Law of Contracts. Third Edition Enforceability
    • 4 August 2020
    ...(CA); New Brunswick v Olsen (1984), 57 NBR (2d) 321 (QB). 263 872899 Ontario Ltd v Iacovoni , above note 247. See also TCB Ltd v Gray , [1986] Ch 621; South-West Oxford Township v Bailack (1990), 75 OR (2d) 360 (Gen Div). 264 [1967] 1 OR 315 (HC). 265 Spear v Bank of Nova Scotia (1973), 37 ......
  • The Companies Act 2008: An Overview of a Few of its Core Provisions
    • South Africa
    • South Africa Mercantile Law Journal No. , May 2019
    • 25 May 2019
    ...company. The more challenging question is the effect of a restriction on42See s 40 of the UK Companies Act 2006.43See TCB Ltd v Gray [1986] 1 Ch 621 and Smith v Henniker-Major & Co (A firm) [2003] Ch 182(CA) where it was held that a quorum requirement for a board meeting was a ‘limitation’ ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT