Tebbutt v Haynes
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Date | 1981 |
Court | Court of Appeal (Civil Division) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
54 cases
-
Dr v Gr (1st Respondent) A.B.C Trust Company (Jersey) Ltd (2nd Respondent) Oakleaf Ltd (3rd Respondent) Deerpark Enterprise Centre Ltd (4th Respondent) Summer Ltd (5th Respondent) Summer International Ltd (6th Respondent)
...procedure without joinder of the trustees. 23 Mr Southgate QC made submissions to me which I found surprising. He argued by reference to Tebbutt v Haynes [1981] 2 All ER 238, Harwood v Harwood [1991] 2 FLR 274 and Whig v Whig [2008] 1 FLR 453 that unless the trustees and the underlying comp......
-
Boswell (Dorothy Patricia) v Kenneth Delroy Boswell and Teino Boswell
...his intervention is to "sensitize" the court as to his interests in the James Avenue property and business thereon. 78The case of Tebbot v Haynes and another (1981) 2 AER 238 is equally of no assistance to the 2 nd Defendant as the interests of the 2 nd Defendant have not been challenged an......
-
Debra Ann Edgerton v Thomas William Edgerton and Another
...assets of the parties are, and its determination, when embodied in an order must, in my view, create estoppel between the parties. In Tebbutt v Haynes [1981] 2 All ER 238, the determination by a Family Division Judge as to the beneficial ownership of an asset between spouses was held to be......
-
Thrasyvoulou v Secretary of State for the Environment
...461. 66 A recent statement of the principle by this Court provides, in my Judgment, a secure basis for the decision of this case. Tebbutt v. Haynes & Anor (1981) 2 All ER 238 was a case concerned with the applicability, in Chancery proceedings, over ownership of a house, of an issue estoppe......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
MATRIMONIAL ASSETS AND THE 3rd PARTY— TO START A NEW FIGHT, TO JOIN IN THE FRAY, TO SPEAK FROM THE SIDELINES, OR TO LIVE IN BLISSFUL IGNORANCE…
...to deal with 3rd party issues involving assets worth more than $250,000. 11 unreported, Divorce Petition No. 663 of 2000 12 [1981] 2 All ER 238 13 Section 24 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (Property adjustment orders in connection with divorce proceedings, etc.) grants the English court......