Tehrani v Secretary of State for the Home Department

JurisdictionScotland
Judgment Date2004
Date2004
Year2004
CourtCourt of Session (Inner House - Extra Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Tehrani v Secretary of State for the Home Department
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 18 October 2006
    ...2004 an Extra Division of the Inner House, comprising Lords Kirkwood, Hamilton and Macfadyen, refused a reclaiming motion by Mr Tehrani: 2004 SLT 461. Mr Tehrani has now appealed to your Lordships' House. Whether there is substance in Mr Tehrani's petition is not a matter which has been can......
  • R(Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority) v First-tier Tribunal (CIC)
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • 20 December 2018
    ...adjudicator or the Immigration Appeal Tribunal sitting in England. A reclaiming motion was refused by an Extra Division of the Inner House 2004 SLT 461, but on different grounds. It found it “difficult to envisage that a situation could arise in practice where the Tribunal would refuse to g......
  • Petition Of Mutas Elabas For Judicial Review Of A Special Adjudicator And Immigration Appeal Tribunal
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 2 July 2004
    ...with Tehrani (no citation was given, but I understood counsel to be referring to Tehrani v Secretary of State for the Home Department, 2004 SLT 461). The Inner House had, in counsel's words, "side-stepped the issue" of whether Irzekevikius was correct, in Mfumu v Secretary of State for the ......
  • R(Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority) v First-tier Tribunal (CIC)
    • United Kingdom
    • Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)
    • Invalid date
    ...adjudicator or the Immigration Appeal Tribunal sitting in England. A reclaiming motion was refused by an Extra Division of the Inner House 2004 SLT 461, but on different grounds. It found it “difficult to envisage that a situation could arise in practice where the Tribunal would refuse to g......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT