Tempest v Lord Camoys (Note)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1881 |
| Date | 1881 |
| Year | 1881 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
27 cases
- Yusof bin Ahmad and Others v Hongkong Bank (Singapore) Ltd and Others
-
Sieff v Fox
...more difficult for a beneficiary to challenge the exercise of their discretions unless a defect is apparent from the documents. In Tempest v. Lord Camoys (1882) 21 Ch D 571 the court would not override the refusal of one of two trustees to agree with a course of action proposed by the other......
-
McPhail v Doulton, sub nom Re Baden's Deed Trusts (No 1)
...and power are coupled the Court can compel the trustees to perform the duty—see Gisborne v. Gisborne (supra) and Tempest v. Lord Camoys 21 Ch.D. 571. 22In the Gulbenkian case (supra) the majority of your Lordships held the view that where there is a valid gift over in default of appointment......
-
Dr Marko Lehtimäki v The Children's Investment Fund Foundation (UK)
...has been conducted, and will not be extended to the accuracy of the conclusion arrived at, except in particular cases”. Again, in Tempest v Lord Camoys (1882) 21 Ch D 571 Jessel MR said (at 578): “It is settled law that when a testator has given a pure discretion to trustees as to the exerc......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Testamentary conditions in restraint of religion in the twenty-first century: an Anglo-Canadian perspective.
...O.R. (3d) 496, 88 O.A.C. 201 (C.A.) [Fox cited to O.R.]. (106) One of the older authorities to this effect is Tempest v. Lord Camoys (1882), 21 Ch. D. 571 (107) Fox, supra note 105 at 502. (108) See text accompanying note 98. (109) Ibid. (110) It is worth noting for comparative purposes tha......