Tenant pur terme de vie le remainder ouster a son fits in fee tenant pur terme de
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Year | 1664 |
| Date | 01 January 1664 |
| Court | Court of Common Pleas |
English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 341
DEL COMMON-BANK
Tenant pur terme de
and
ie le remainder ouster a son fits in fee tenant pur terme de
XCVIII. Tenant pur terme de vie le remainder ouster a son fits in fee tenant pur terrae de vie est disaeisi per estrange vers que process est port que vouche le common vouche et issint recovery passe, &c. en cest Case cestuy en remainder est sans remedy per le statute de 32 H. 8. cap. 31. come semble a les Justices, et autiel Case fuit de un Lee de Cornwall. Anno 15 Eliz. Beginai.
To continue reading
Request your trial
13 cases
-
Walls v P.J. Walls Holdings Ltd
...independent architect and Ann Sherratt an astute commercial minded person. Between them, they hold 38 of the 110 shares issued in Properties and 38 of the 100 shares issued in Thornhill. I am satisfied that the conclusion of the learned trial judge that the onus in this case rests on the ap......
-
Australian Electoral Commission v Johnston and Others (Matter No C17/2013)
...a total of 1,349,635 ballot papers were submitted at the election of senators for Western Australia, of which 1,311,440 were unrejected votes and 38,195 were informal votes. 51 50 Re-counting those votes which were the subject of the Electoral Commissioner's direction and were available for......
-
Jalousie (1996) Ltd Claimant v [1] The Labour Commissioner [2] Attorney General Defendants [ECSC]
...words assume or imply that the persons who voted, and not those who were entitled to vote determine the results of the poll. (5) Sections 29 and 38 make provisions for 2 different methods of determining the results of the relevant secret polls. Whereas the results are determined from those ......
-
[1] Vivian Alexander [2] John Hector Appellants v Richie Smith by his Next Friend Delicia Toussaint Respondent [ECSC]
...of corresponding sections of the UK Act, the fact that the Parliament of Dominica did not also enact provisions similar to sections 28( 1) and 38(2) of the UK Act, or sections with the same effect, precludes any inference that Parliament intended the fact of infancy or minority to suspend t......
Request a trial to view additional results