Terry Gardener Ryan James Glynn Appellants Against HM Advocate
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Neutral Citation | 2010 SCCR 116 |
| Date | 2010 |
| Court | Unspecified Court (Scotland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
5 cases
-
Laura Stewart V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...for what period. The Crown's approach was entirely appropriate, as were the trial judge's directions: cf Gardener & Glynn v HM Advocate 2010 SCCR 116 at paragraphs [17] to [20]. The appeal should be refused. Discussion [11] We accept that there may be circumstances in which assailants actin......
-
Green v HM Advocate
...SCL 181; 2011 GWD 37–758 Ferguson v HM Advocate [2015] HCJAC 89; 2015 SCL 972; 2015 GWD 35–563 Gardener v HM Advocate [2009] HCJAC 92; 2010 SCCR 116; 2010 SCL 330; 2010 GWD 4–65 Gubinas v HM Advocate [2017] HCJAC 25; 2017 SLT 663; 2017 SCL 556 H v HM Advocate [2010] HCJAC 111; 2011 JC 149; ......
-
Asif Rehman+adel Ishaq V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...there was a proper evidential basis for the jury considering returning separate verdicts against both accused (cf Gardener v HM Advocate 2010 SCCR 116). Secondly, the trial judge ought to have directed the jury in the way proposed in Cussick v HM Advocate 2001 SCCR 683. Thirdly, the issue o......
-
Notes Of Appeal Against Conviction And Sentence By (first) Paul Green, (second) Lee Noonan And (third) Robbie Darren Brown
...the issue had been live and obvious, the trial judge ought to have directed the jury on individual responsibility (Gardener v HM Advocate 2010 SCCR 116 at para [17]). Instead, he chose to direct the jury simply on the Crown’s approach to concert. The jury could only determine the case on th......
Request a trial to view additional results