The Annot Lyle
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 09 June 1886 |
| Date | 09 June 1886 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
62 cases
- Jaya Harta Realty Sdn Bhd v Koperasi Kemajuan Pekerja-Pekerja Ladang Bhd
- Che Wan Development Sdn Bhd v Co-operative Central Bank Bhd
- Bright v Femcare Ltd
-
Pfizer Ltd v Medimpex Jamaica Ltd, NMF Pharmaceuticals Ltd and Lasco Distributors Ltd
...a successful litigant should not be deprived of the fruits of his judgment, or more accurately in this case, the order in his favour ( The Annot Lyle (1886) 11 P. 141 at p. 146 ); and secondly that the court ought to see that a party exercising his right to appeal does not have his appeal, ......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Courts 2
...(Pt. 759) 118 at 129. 1338. Court’s duty not to deprive a successful litigant of the fruit of his litigation. “In the Annot Lyle (1886) 11 P.D. 114 at 116, it was held that the Court should not make a practice of depriving a successful litigant of the fruits of his litigation and locking up......
-
Filing appeal out of time
...of execution since the Courts would not normally deprive a successful party of the fruits of his successful litigation. The Annot Lyle (1886) 11 P.D. 114, 116.” - Per Ogundare, J.C.A., in Enabulele v. Agbonlahor (1994) 5 N.W.L.R. (Pt. 112) 112 at 125. 1184. Duty of the registrar of the High......