The Arantzazu Mendi
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 23 February 1939 |
| Date | 23 February 1939 |
| Docket Number | Case No. 25 |
| Court | House of Lords |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
107 cases
-
Civil Aeronautics Administration v Singapore Airlines Ltd
...of particular interest to note that in the later case of Government of the Republic of Spain v SS “Arantzazu Mendi” (The Arantzazu Mendi) [1939] AC 256, the more expansive approach advocated by Lord Sumner in Duff Development was expressly disapproved of by the entire quorum of the House. L......
-
North South Yacht Vacations Ltd v The Owners and Persons Interested in the Ship ‘‘Heartbeat’’
...to the Claimant in accordance with Part 65 Appendix B of C.P.R. 2000. Suzie d'Auvergne High Court Judge 1 [1979] 1 AER 883 ,889 F—J 2 [1939] AC 256, 266 3 17 th Edition 15–45 ...
-
HRH Prince Abdulaziz Bin Mishal Bin Abdulaziz Al Saud and Another v Apex Global Management Ltd
...context of international relations in which it has been held that the UK Government and courts should speak with one voice, ( The Arantzazu Mendi [1939] AC 256, at 264), there is thus a direct indication in the form of the Immigration Directorate's Instructions that the view of the UK Gove......
-
Serdar Mohammed v Ministry of Defence
...in the field of foreign relations was most famously stated by Lord Atkin in Government of the Republic of Spain v SS "Arantzazu Mendi" [1939] AC 256, 264, where he said: "Our state cannot speak with two voices on such a matter, the judiciary saying one thing, the executive another." To simi......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
-
Versloot Dredging BV v HDI-Gerling Industrie Versicherungs AG - The DC Merwestone - should an alternative materiality test be applied in cases involving the use of a fraudulent device?
...Transport Operations (Marine Pollution) Regulation 2008 (Qld). 3see for example Government of the Republic of Spain v SS Arantzazu Mendi [1939] AC 256 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your spec......
8 books & journal articles
-
National litigation and international law: repercussions for Australia's protection of marine resources.
...(6) 'Our State cannot speak with two voices on such a matter, the judiciary saying one thing, the executive another': The Arantzazu Mendi [1939] AC 256, 264 (Lord Atkin). See also Thomas v Mowbray (2007) 233 CLR 307, 354-5 (Gummow and Crennan (7) These doctrines are variously described as '......
-
CONTRACTUAL ILLEGALITY AND CONFLICT OF LAWS
...and considerations of the inter-relationship of the judicial and executive arms of government may be paramount. See The Arantzazu Mendi[1939] A.C. 256 at 264 and GUR Corporation v. Trust Bank of Africa Ltd.[1987] Q.B. 599 at 625. It is also clear from The Mary [1992] 2 Lloyd’s Rep. at 480 t......
-
The "common-law regime" of foreign sovereign immunity: the actual possession rule in admiralty.
...to actual possession by a foreign government). (105.) See id. at 37 n.2 (canvassing British authorities, including The Arantzazu Mendi, [1939] A.C. 256 (H.L.), 263 (Eng.) and Compania Naviera Vascongado v. S.S. Cristina, [1938] A.C. 485 (H.L.) (106.) Id. at 38 (citing Sullivan v. State of S......
-
The Role of the Judiciary in Foreign Affairs To Be Duly Recognised, with Special Reference to the Supreme Court of the USA
...L Collin s “Foreign Relations and the Jud iciary” (20 02) 51 ICLQ 485 485 At 487, Collins quo tes Lord Atkin in Th e Aranzazu Mendi (1939) AC 256 264 who famously a rticulated t his principle: “Our state can not speak with two voices on such a matt er, the judiciary sayin g one thing, the e......
Request a trial to view additional results