The Charlotte
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 09 March 1908 |
| Date | 09 March 1908 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
16 cases
- Alliance Entertainment Singapore Pte Ltd v Sim Kay Teck and Another
- Wibau Maschinenfabric Hartman S.A. v Mackinnon Mackenzie & Company (Chanda)
-
Sevylor Shipping and Trading Corporation v Altfadul Company for Foods, Fruits & Livestock
...than sound goods due to the carrier's breach. Hobhouse J considered and relied on cases about claims in tort for negligence, such as The Charlotte [1908] P 206 (a collision case) and The Aliakmon [1986] AC 785 (cargo damage). In relation to torts, English law has developed by reference to......
-
HSBC Rail (UK) Ltd v Network Rail Infrastructure Ltd (Formerly Railtrack Plc)
...immediate right to possession, can recover the value of the goods even where he has been compensated by his bailee. In both The Charlotte [1908] P 206 and Obestain v National Mineral Development Co [1987] 1 Lloyds Rep 465 the claimants were goods-owners with the right to possession at the t......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
The Origins and Restriction of Efficiency in Public Administration
...and given efficiency in the discharge of their own functions has only emphasized their separation and jealous independence” (W. Wilson, 1908, p. 206).10 Although in the work of both Bentham and Taylor we did find statements in which efficiency was closely associated with the best use of res......