The Consul Corfitzon

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
Judgment Date21 June 1917
Date21 June 1917
CourtPrivy Council
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
9 cases
  • Bank of Montreal v. 3D Properties Inc. et al. (No. 2), (1993) 111 Sask.R. 63 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 20 Mayo 1993
    ...7]. Steier v. University Hospital Board et al., [1988] 4 W.W.R. 303; 67 Sask.R. 81 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 7]. Ship Consul Corfitzon, [1917] A.C. 550 (P.C.), refd to. [para. Board v. Hedley (Thomas) & Co., [1951] 2 All E.R. 431 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 8]. Boxer and Boxer Holdings Ltd. v......
  • Christopher Morris and Others v Banque Arabe Et Internationale D'investissement Sa
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 6 Diciembre 1999
    ...in a case such as this is supported by two lines of high authority. The first is a decision of the Privy Council, Consul Corfitzon [1917] A.C. 550, where Lord Parker of Waddington said this in his judgment at 555–6: "A Court of Prize cannot properly be deterred from making what it conceives......
  • Popowich v. Saskatchewan et al., (1995) 135 Sask.R. 122 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 11 Septiembre 1995
    ...that of his adversary, or may fairly lead to a train of inquiry which may have either of these consequences : see The Consul Corfitzon , [1917] A.C. 550 (P.C.); Broad v. Thomas Hedley & Co. , [1951] 2 All E.R. 431 (C.A.); Boxer v. Reesor (1983), 43 B.C.L.R. 352 (S.C.). From the pleading......
  • Bank of Montreal v. 3D Properties Inc. et al. (No. 3), (1993) 110 Sask.R. 302 (QB)
    • Canada
    • Saskatchewan Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 20 Mayo 1993
    ...7]. Steier v. University Hospital Board et al., [1988] 4 W.W.R. 303; 67 Sask.R. 81 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 7]. Ship Consul Corfitzon, [1917] A.C. 550 (P.C.), refd to. [para. Board v. Hedley (Thomas) & Co., [1951] 2 All E.R. 431 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 8]. Boxer and Boxer Holdings Ltd. v......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT