The End of Safe Harbor: What Future for EU-US Data Transfers?

AuthorSergio Carrera,Elspeth Guild
Published date01 October 2015
Date01 October 2015
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X1502200501
Subject MatterEditorial
22 MJ 5 (2015) 651
EDITORIAL
THE END OF SAFE HARBOR: WHAT
FUTURE FOR EU-US DATA TRANSFERS?
S C and E G*
On 6October 2015, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down
a judgment which surprised ma ny working on EU-US data transfers. In Schrems,1 the
CJ EU a nnu ll ed t he Com mi ssi on’s D ec isi on 2 00 0/52 0 of Jul y 20 00 2 according to which US
data protection rules a re ‘adequate’ to satisfy the rules c omprising the EU data protection
architecture as regards the t ransfer of personal data from the EU to undertakings i n the
US.
§1. WHAT DOES THE JUDGMENT MEAN?
e EU-US Safe Harbor framework permits busi nesses on both sides of the Atlantic
to transfer personal data to one another without requiring a speci c analysis of data
protection and an assessment of its compatibility with EU data protection law. e
programme was designed to reduce t he administrative burden of complying with the
Data Protection Directive3 and to ensure that data ows to Europe are uninterrupted.
is s ystem was based on voluntary participation by compan ies.
e EU-US Safe Harbor fra mework depends on a Commission decision which
declares that US personal d ata protection rules provide an ‘adequate level of protection’
for personal data consistent with EU standards. Decision 2000/520 was annulled by the
* Sergio Carre ra is Senior Research Fel low and Head of the Justice a nd Home A airs Prog ramme at
CEPS, and Ass ociate Professor/Senior Res earcher at the Facult y of Law of the University of Maa stricht.
Elspeth Gu ild is Associate Senior R esearch Fellow at CEPS and Je an Monnet Professor ad personam of
European im migration law at Radboud Universit y Nijmegen and Queen Mary, University of L ondon.
is piece is base d on a larger article prep ared for the SOURCE project (Socie tal Securit y Network
funded by the EU S eventh Framework Progra mme for Research.
1 Case C-362/14 Schrems v. Data Protecti on Commissioner, EU:C:2015:650.
2 Commission Decision 2000/520/EC of 26July 2000 pursuant to Directive 95/46/EC of the European
Parliament and of t he Council on the adequa cy of the protection provide d by the safe harbour priv acy
principles and relate d frequently asked quest ions issued by the US Depar tment of Commerce (noti ed
under document numb er C(2000) 2441) (Text with EEA releva nce), [2000] OJ L 215/7.
3 Directive 95/46/EC of t he European Parli ament and of the Counc il of 24October 1995 on the protect ion
of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data,
[1995] OJ L 281/31.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT