The "General de Caen"-(Guichon) Master

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date08 December 1855
Date08 December 1855
CourtHigh Court of Admiralty

English Reports Citation: 166 E.R. 990

HIGH COURT OF ADMIRALTY OF ENGLAND

The "General de Caen"-(Guichon) Master

S. C. 26 L. T. (O. S.) 165.

[9] the " general de caen "-(Guichon) Master. December 8, 1855 -Collision -Compulsory pilotage-Exemption under section 388 of Merchant Shipping Act. -A French vessel coming up the Thames took on board a pilot, and, as none of her crew'understood English, a waterman to take the wheel. The waterman put her helm up instead of luffing, as the pilot ordered, whereby a barge was run into and damaged ; the French owner claimed exemption under the 388th section of the Merchant Shipping Act ; held, that the pilot was not answerable for the waterman's incapacity or fault, and that the section of the Act, inasmuch as it depnves parties injured of a remedy they would otherwise have had, should be construed strictly. [S. C. 26 L. T. (O. S.) 165.] In this case, a French vessel, the " General de Caen," coming up the Thames under charge of a duly qualified pilot, ran into and damaged a barge lying at anchor off Gravesend. As to the fact of the collision, and that the French vessel was in fault, there was no dispute ; but her owners claimed to be protected under section 388 of the Merchant Shipping Act, 1854, which enacts, that " No owner or master of any ship shall be answerable to any person whatever for any loss or damage occasioned by the fault or incapacity of any qualified pilot acting in charge of such ahip, within any district where the employment of such pilot is compulsory by law " The owners of the " General de Caen " admitted that the pilot, under the circum-atances, gave the right order, but asserted that the collision aroae from that order not having been properly carried out by the man at the wheel, who was an English waterman hired to accompany the vessel up the river, as none of the crew spoke English, at the request and desire of the pilot, and ordered by the pilot to go to the wheel; that thas man must be considered to be the pilot's servant, and that the pilot would be responsible for the misconduct or inefficiency of the waterman, so hired and under his orders, as if it were his own The owners, of the barge damaged denied that the waterman was hired by the pilot, or that the pilot was in any way responsible for him, but asserted that the waterman was hired by Mr Davis, the agent of the owner of the vessel, who was on board, and by the master. swab i. the "general de caen" 991 The Court was assisted by...

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • The "Wild Ranger."
    • United Kingdom
    • High Court of Admiralty
    • 23 June 1863
    ...and the 388th section, which takes away from the shipowner liability for the act of a pilot compulsorily employed, " General de Caen " (Swab. 9) These sections, like the 504th, relate to remedy, and may thus be distinguished from sections 296, 297, which, prescribing rules for the conduct a......
  • R. v. Daley,
    • Canada
    • Superior Court of Justice of Ontario (Canada)
    • 30 August 2021
    ...be excluded. 42 BPA swab 8 (on floor outside door of bedroom 2) Blood detected Single Source James Pasowisty cannot be excluded 43, 54, BPA swab 9 (pool on floor in front of cupboards in kitchen) BPA swab 51 (right arm of futon) Blood At least 2 James Pasowisty cannot be excluded 44, 49, 51......
  • R v C.C.D.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Saskatchewan (Canada)
    • 28 July 2022
    ...a second report. In this report, she disclosed that she analysed six exhibits: (1) 741-001 (R.B.’s underwear); (2) 741-004 (rectal swab 9-B from R.B.); (3) 741-005 (anal swab 8-A from R.B.); (4) 741-008 (vaginal swab 7-B from R.B.); (5) 741-009 (external genitalia swab 6-A from R.B.)......
  • R NECKEESHA ERSKINE v London Borough of LAMBETH and
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 14 October 2003
    ...On 3rd August 1998 London Borough of Lambeth granted a secure tenancy of a 2 bedroom maisonette on the upper two floors of 137 Fenwick Place, SW9, to the claimant. The kitchen was equipped with a sink, fixed storage cupboards and working surfaces, a gas cooker and hob, a washing machine and......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Shipping ECA finance 2018 edition
    • United States
    • JD Supra United States
    • 3 July 2018
    ...and contribute to the completeness and accuracy of our deal coverage. Mailing address: Canterbury Court 1-3 Brixton Road London, SW9 6DE - Tel: +44 (0) 20 3735 Registered office: TXF Limited 7-10 Chandos Street - London W1G 9DQ Registered in England & Wales. Registered No: 08421624 © TXF Li......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT