The "Halcyon Isle" Bankers Trust International Ltd v Todd Shipyards Corporation

JurisdictionUK Non-devolved
CourtPrivy Council
Judgment Date1980
Date1980
Year1980

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
25 cases
  • Ocean Jade', Owners of cargo laden on board the ship or vessel; 'Ocean Jade', Owners of the ship or vessel v; The Ocean Jade
    • Malaysia
    • High Court (Malaysia)
    • 1 January 1991
  • The "Ocean Jade"
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 27 February 1991
    ...5 LRPC 134 (refd) Conoco Britannia, The [1972] 2 QB 543 (refd) Fortitude, In re (1843) 2 W Rob 217; 166 ER 736 (refd) Halcyon Isle, The [1981] AC 221 (folld) J (an infant), Re [1960] 1 WLR 253; [1960] 1 All ER 603 (folld) Kaleten, The [1914] 30 TLR 572 (distd) Place v Potts (1855) 5 HLC 383......
  • R v Governor of Pentonville Prison, ex parte Osman
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 30 March 1988
    ...264, C.A. Greenough v. Gaskell (1833) Coop. temp. Brough 96 Haw Tua Tau v. Public Prosecutor [1982] A.C. 136; [1981] 3 W.L.R. 395; [1981] 3 All E.R. 14, Huguet, Ex parte (1873) 29 L.T.R. 41 King v. The Queen [1969] 1 A.C. 304; [1968] 3 W.L.R. 391; [1969] 2 All E.R. 610, P.C. Kuruma v. The Q......
  • The "Ohm Mariana" ex "Peony"
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 11 March 1992
    ... ... attorney in favour of Doreen Ng, and (iv) a trust deed by Halim Mohammad in favour of Bernt Forsell ... : see ` The Acrux `3 and ` The Halcyon Isle 4 In any case in which there is a maritime ... ...
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Foreign maritime lien recognised under Australian admiralty law: Federal Court rejects Halcyon Isle
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 12 January 2016
    ...determine whether such a lien arose under the law of the United States or Canada. The majority of the Privy Council in The Halcyon Isle [1981] AC 221, in a much-criticised decision, had held that the existence of a maritime lien was to be determined according to the law of the forum. Howeve......
  • Australia permits arrest of vessel on foreign maritime lien claim
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 20 September 2015
    ...lien for the supply of necessaries, including bunkers. Prior to this case, following the Privy Council decision in the "Halcyon Isle" ([1981] AC 221) the existence of a maritime lien was held to be a matter of procedure, which was to be determined under Australian law for any claims commenc......
22 books & journal articles
  • Tools and Techniques
    • United Kingdom
    • Oxford University Press Books and Journals Private International Law In English Courts (Second Edition)
    • Invalid date
    ...the Rome I and Rome II Regulations, but see Sedgwick v Mapfre España Compania de Seguros y Reaseguros SA {2022] EWHC 2704 (KB). 275 The Halcyon Isle [1981] AC 221. See also The Sam Hawk [2016] FCAFC 26, [2016] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 276 At least where it arises in a contractual setting: First Laser ......
  • Chapter 4: Admiralty Jurisdiction, Maritime Claims, Liens and Sovereign Immunity
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Maritime Law
    • Invalid date
    ...or the law of the country exercising jurisdiction (lex fori)? The problem attracted the attention of the Privy Council in The Halcyon Isle [1980] 3 All ER 197. It was considering an appeal to it from a Singapore court. It decided that the consensus of English case law authority concluded th......
  • Chapter 1: Registration
    • United Kingdom
    • Taylor and Francis Merchant Shipping Legislation
    • Invalid date
    ...of priority are governed by the lex fori: The Union (1860) Lush 128, 3 LT 280; Bankers Trust International Ltd v Todd Shipyards Corp, The Halcyon Isle [1981] AC 221, [1980] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 325, 1980 AMC 1221 (PC). Whether or not a claim arising outside of England will be treated as a maritime......
  • Maritime liens and the conflict of laws - an exegesis of The Halcyon Isle and preceding Anglo-common law decisions
    • South Africa
    • Sabinet Transactions of the Centre for Business Law No. 2011-47, January 2011
    • 1 January 2011
    ...as payee, the sum of 20,000 francs in respect of each bill. Soon afterwards, the appellant’s father returned to Scotland where he died.1 [1981] AC 221.2 [1981] AC 221.3 (1837) 7 ER 322Lippmann instituted proceedings on the bills against Don as the representative of his deceased father. The ......
  • Get Started for Free