The "Hamburg."

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date16 March 1864
Date16 March 1864
CourtHigh Court of Admiralty

English Reports Citation: 167 E.R. 362

HIGH COURT OF ADMIRALTY

The "Hamburg."

S. C. 2 Moore, P. C. (N. S) 289; 15 E. R. 911, 33 L. J. (Adm) 116; 10 L. T. 206; 10 Jur. (N. S) 600, 12 W R 628, 2 Mar L C. (Crockford) 1 Distinguished, Lloyd v. Gurbert, 1865, 6 B. & S. 100, the "Gaetano and Maria," 1882, 7 P. D. 137. Referred to, The "Bahia," p 292, post; The Lizzie," 1868, L. R. 2 ad. & Ecc. 254, The "Empire of Peace," 1869, 39 L J (Adm) 12; The "Staffordshire," 1871, 25 L. T. 137; Australasian Steam Navigation Company v. Morse, 1872, 27 L. T. 357; The "San Roman," 1872, L R. 3 Ad. & Ecc 583, Klernwort Cohen v. Cassa Maritima of Genoa, 1877, 2 A C 156, Acatos v. Burns, 1878, 3 Ex. D. 282.

[253] in the privy council Present-Lord Chelmsford. Lord Kingsdown Sir John Coleridge. the " hamburg." March 16, 1864 -Bottomry bond on ship, freight and cargo- Obligation of master to tranship-Duty to communicate with owners of cargo -Validity of bond tried by law maritime-The " Bonaparte " (8 Moore, P. C. 459) explained.-Where a bottomry bond is made payable upon arrival at the ship's port of destination in England, the validity of the bond is triable by the general maritime law as administered in England, and not by the law of the ship's flag, or the law of the place where the bond was executed.(a) If there are means of repairing the ship at the port of distress, the master has no obligation to tranship the cargo The character of agent for the owners of the cargo is imposed upon the master solely by the necessity of the case. The master of a ship, therefore, has not authority to hypothecate the cargo, if in the circumstances of the case it is...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • The Tolten
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 16 April 1946
  • The Tolten
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • Invalid date
  • The Australasian Steam Navigation Company v Morse
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 10 May 1872
    ...Co.459; The Hamburg, 1 Mar. Law Cas O. S.327; 2 Mar. Law Cas. O. S. 1 ;8 L. T. Rep. N. 8. 175; 1016. 206; 2 Moo. Priv. Co, N. S. 289; Br. & Lush. 253. Sir J. Karslaks, Q.C. and Thesiger for the respondents.-The verdict was against evidence and against law. The questions submitted to the jur......
  • Kleinwort, Cohen, & Company v Cassa Marittima of Genoa
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 18 January 1877
    ...and maintained that the bond was invalid because the master had not communicated with the owners of the cargo. See The Hamburgh (Br. & Lush. 253; 2 Mar. Law Cas. 0. S. 1), The Onward (ante, vol. 1, p. 540; 28 L.T. Rep. 253; L. Rep. 4 A. & E. 38), and the case there cited. The cases show cle......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT