The Italian European Arrest Warrants for the Five Greeks Taking Part in Riots and Their Rejection by the Greek Authorities

AuthorAntonios E. Kouroutakis
Published date01 September 2016
Date01 September 2016
DOI10.1177/203228441600700304
Subject MatterCase Notes
New Journal of Eu ropean Crimina l Law, Vol. 7, Issue 3, 2016 295
THE ITALIAN EUROPEAN ARREST
WARRANTS FOR THE FIVE GREEKS TAKING
PART IN RIOTS AND THEIR REJECTION BY
THE GREEK AUTHORITIES
A E. K*
1. INTRODUCTION
In May 2015 protests took place in Milan aga inst the Expo 2015 (Universal Exposit ion)
but violence overshadowed the demonstrations as the streets of Milan were
transformed into a battleground.  e Italian police detai ned a number of
demonstrators, among them  ve Greek students who were  ngerprinted and were
subjected to (DNA) sample collection but they were released and retu rned to Greece.
e same year, in November the Italian authorities prosecuted them with the
accusation of causing damages1 and ag gravated resist ance during t he
demonstrations.2 Such charges entail prison sentence s of 8 to 15 years as a number of
factors increased the se verity of the aforementioned criminal acts .
On 9November 2015 the Italian authorities issued a European Arrest Warrant
(hereina er EAW)3 and requested their arrest a nd extradition to Italy.
e thorough examination of the decisions is of signi cant importance for two
reasons. First it is believed to be the  rst time t hat the mechanism of the EAW has
been used to extradite protesters being charged for crimes such as aggravated
resistance in combination with the use of improvised weapons, a nd destruction and
looting. Second, these decisions test the functioning a nd the limits of the EAW
mechanism as the criminal legal f ramework between Italy, the issuing country and
Greece, the country f rom which extradition is sought lacks harmonisation. In Italy
the charges car ry far heavier penalties tha n the equivalent acts in Greece.
* Postdoctoral Fellow at Aristotle University of essaloniki (DPhil Oxon, L LM UCLA School of
Law, LLB Democritus University of race). e author is grateful t o Ms Niovi Vavoula for her
valuable comments.
1 See Italia n Penal Code, Arti cles61 (2), 81 (1) and (2), 110, 112, 419 and 423.
2 See Italia n Penal Code, Ar ticles81 (1) and (2), 110, 337, 339 (2) and (3).
3 2002/584/J HA: Council Fra mework Decision of 13June 2002 on t he European arres t warrant and
the surrender pro cedures between Mem ber States, OJ L 190 of 18.7. 2002.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT