The Jupiter (No. 3)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1927
Year1927
Date1927
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
24 cases
  • WestLB AG v Philippine National Bank & Others
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 27 December 2006
    ... ... The other defendants, the 8th and the 9th defendants, withdrew from this action and took no further part in the proceedings from 16 March 2006; ... (j)     pursuant to an Order of Court of 24 March 2004 made in these proceedings, ... 12     Earl Jowitt was concerned over an earlier decision, The Jupiter [1924] P 236, where Scrutton LJ stated that he was content to uphold a claim for state immunity on a sovereign’s bare assertion of ownership ... ...
  • A.G. Der Manufacturen I.A. Woronin Leutschig & Cheshire v Frederick Hutts & Company
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • 2 May 1928
    ...112, 150; Employers' Liability Assurance Corporation v. Sedgwick, Collins & Co.ELR, L.R. [1927] A.C. 95; and The Jupiter (No. 3)ELR, L.R. [1927] P. 122, 250 (Annual Digest, 1925–1926, Cases Nos. 100, 101 and 102), that although the effect of the Soviet Decrees might be to terminate the prac......
  • Kuwait Airways Corporation v Iraqi Airways Company (Nos 4 & 5)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 27 March 2002
    ...a way that it does not purport to have extra-territorial effect: see Lecouturier v Rey [1910] AC 262, 265–6 and 267; The Jupiter (No 3) [1927] P 122, 145; and Re Russian Bank for Foreign Trade [1933] Ch 745, 767. Against that background, we do not see why the courts of this forum should gi......
  • Playa Larga (Owners of cargo lately laden on board) v I Congreso del Partido (Owners); Marble Islands (Owners of cargo lately laden on board) v I Congreso del Partido (Owners); I Congreso del Partido
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 28 January 1977
    ...Certainly Hill J. appears to have treated it as an issue in the motion which had been referred to him: see The Jupiter (No. 3)ELR[46] [1927] P. 122, 124. Indeed, it is difficult to see how, in all the circumstances, such an action can be allowed to proceed until the question of the solicito......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT