The King against Gourlay

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1828
Date01 January 1828
CourtCourt of the King's Bench

English Reports Citation: 108 E.R. 873

IN THE COURT OF KING'S BENCH.

The King against Gourlay

S. C. (sub nom. Ex parte Gourlay) 1 Man. & Ry. 619; 6 L. J. M. C. O. S. 89. Referred to, Ex parte Terraz, 1878, 4 Ex. D. 70; R. v. Jacobi, 1881, 46 L. T. 596, n.

the king against gourlay. 1828. A commitment of an insane person under the 39 & 40 G. 3, c. 94, s. 3, is not a commitment in execution, and is not, therefore, to be construed with the same strictness; and, therefore, a warrant, stating that A. B. had been discovered and apprehended under circumstances that denoted a derangement of mind, and a purpose of committing some crime, for which, if committed, he would be liable to be indicted, to wit, an assault, and that the said A. B., being brought before the justice, he committed him, was held to be sufficient, although it did not state the name of the person whom the prisoner intended to assault, and it did not appear that the committing magistrate received any evidence on oath. [S. C. (sub nom. Exparte Gmtrlay) 1 Man. & Ey. 619; 6 L. J. M. C. 0. S. 89. Referred to, Exparte Terras, 1878, 4 Ex, D. 70; B. v. JacoU, 1881, 46 L. T. 596, n.] The prisoner was committed to the house of correction for the county of Middlesex, (a) The case was previously argued before three of the Judges of this Court during their sittings in Bane after Michaelmas term. K. B. XXXVII.-28* 874 THE KING V. GOURLAY 7B.&C.CTO. by the following warrant, signed by a magistrate of Middlesex :-" Whereas Robert Gourlay hath been discovered and apprehended under circumstances that denote a derangement of mind, and a purpose of committing a crime (that is to say) an assault and breach of the peace, [670] for which, if committed, he would be liable to be indicted ; and the said Robert Gourlay being brought before me, one of the justices of the peace for the said county, and it appearing to me that I ought to issue a warrant for committing him as a dangerous person suspected to be insane, these are therefore to command you and each of you to receive into your custody the body of the said Robert Gourlay, herewith sent, as a dangerous person, suspected to be insane, and him safely to keep in your custody, until he shall be bailed as directed by the statute in that case made and provided, or until he shall be discharged by due course of law; and for so doing this shall be your sufficient warrant." The prisoner being now brought into Court by virtue of a habeas corpus, Campbell moved that he might...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • State (C.) v Minister for Justice
    • Ireland
    • Supreme Court
    • 31 July 1967
    ...and by Mr. Justice Walsh. FitzGerald J. :— I also agree. (1) Before Ó Dálaigh ó dálaigh C.J., Haugh, Walsh, Budd and FitzGerald JJ. (1) 7 B. & C. 669. (2) 9 C. & P. 195. (3) 11 I. C. L. R. 279. (4) [1935] I. R. 128. (5) [1940] I. R. 136. (6) [1941] I. R. 68. (7) [1950] I. R. 67. (8) [1950] ......
  • Coghlan v Woods, Molloy and Hatchell
    • Ireland
    • Exchequer Division (Ireland)
    • 24 February 1882
    ...R. 279. Hodgens v. PoeUNKIR I. R. 2 C. L. 52. Fitzpatrick v. PineUNK 13 Ir. C. L. R. 32. Lindsay v. Leigh 11 Q. B. 455. Rex v. GourleyENR 7 B. & C. 669. Bowdler's Case 12 Q. B. 619. Braham v. JoyceENR 4 Ex. 487. Laurenson v. HillUNK 10 Ir. C. L. R. 177. Irwin v. OsborneUNK 5 Ir. C. L. R. 40......
  • The Queen, at the prosecution of George Fetherstone, v Samuel Riall and W. H. Riall; and John Fetherstone, an Alleged Lunatic
    • Ireland
    • Queen's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 24 January 1860
    ...GEORGE FETHERSTONE, and SAMUEL RIALL and W. H. RIALL; and In the Matter of JOHN FETHERSTONE, an alleged Lunatic. The King v. GourlayENR 7 B. & C. 669. Rex v. ClarkeENR 3 Burr. 1362. The King v. Gourlay Supra. In re Fell 3 D. & L. 381, 384. The King v. Gourlay Supra. The Queen v. DunnENR 12 ......
  • Re The Rev. Tresham Dames Gregg, Clerk
    • Ireland
    • Queen's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 8 May 1841
    ...& Al. 295. Rex v. ElwellENR 2 Strange, 794. Dr. Groenvelt's case 1 Ld. Ray. 213. Rex v. TregarthenENR 7 B. & Ad. 678. Rex v. GourlayENR 7 B. & C. 669. Rex v. BurfordENR 1 Vent. 16. Regina v. Dunne 10 Law Journ. 29. Atkinson v. Carty 1 Jebb & S. 385. 316 CASES AT LAW. E. T. 184L Queen'sBench......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT