The King v Southern Canada Power Company
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 1937 |
| Date | 1937 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
7 cases
-
Savoie v. Landry et al., [1966] N.B. Law News No. 36 (CA)
...(1939), 1 K.B. 540, at 554; Parke B. in Bridge v. Grand Junction Ry. (1838), 3 M. & W. 244 and R. v. Southern Canada Power Co. (1937), 3 All E.R. 923, at 930. [9] The burden of proving contributory negligence is on the defendant, it is not for the plaintiff to disprove it. If the defend......
-
Abel v. British Columbia Hydro and Power Authority, 2017 BCSC 556
...which include: Maunsell v. Lethbridge Northern Irrigation District, [1926] S.C.R. 603; The King v. Southern Canada Power Co., [1937] 3 All E.R. 923 (J.C.P.C.) [Southern Canada Power]; Kelley v. Canadian Northern Railway, [1950] 2 D.L.R. 760 (B.C.C.A.) [Kelley]; and Hoge v. Burleigh Co......
-
D'Annibale v. Allen, [1967] N.B. Law News No. 59 (QB)
...(1939) 1 K.B. 540 at 554, Parke B. in Bridge v. Grand Junction By., (1838) 3 M. & W. 244; and R. v. Southern Canada Power Co. (1937) 3 All E.R. 923 at 930. " [34] I am satisfied on the evidence, that the negligence of William Ricketts, in this instance very materially contributed t......
-
D'Annibale v. Allen, [1967] N.B. Law News No. 59 (QB)
...(1939) 1 K.B. 540 at 554, Parke B. in Bridge v. Grand Junction By., (1838) 3 M. & W. 244; and R. v. Southern Canada Power Co. (1937) 3 All E.R. 923 at 930. " [34] I am satisfied on the evidence, that the negligence of William Ricketts, in this instance very materially contributed t......
Request a trial to view additional results