The Loredano
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 27 March 1922 |
| Date | 27 March 1922 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
South African Railways and Harbours v Smith's Coasters (Prop) Ltd
...is generally bound otherwise. See Halsbury's Laws of England (vol. VII, para. 219); Smithett v Blythe (109 E.R. 876) and The Loredano (1922, p. 209). From the object aimed at it is clear that the original enactment of 1734 was to protect British ship-owners from paying more than the value o......
-
The Queen v. Murray et al.,
...this point of view, a difference between the legisla-ture's authority in relation to such contracts and its 91545-41 The Loredano, [1922] P. 209. 1965 Cayzer, Irvine dc Co. v. Board of Trade, [ 1927] 1 K.B. 269. THE QUEEN V. In re Silver Brothers Ltd., [1932] A.C. 514. ......
-
Canada Steamship Lines Ltd. v. Emile Chabland Ltd. et al,
...to those authorities, the following: (Attorney-General for New South Wales v. Curator of Intestate Estates) (1907) A.C. 519; The Loredano 1922, P. 209. The Bankruptcy Acts are similarly for public good; they were on the same footing before 1883 Rex v. Pixley (Bun-bury Reports, 202) ; since ......