The Mardina Merchant
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1974 |
| Date | 1974 |
| Court | Queen's Bench Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
15 cases
- Gula Perak Bhd v Varghese Mathai (1988) 1 MSCLC 90, 168;
-
Wee Soon Kim Anthony v The Law Society of Singapore (No 3)
...only be invoked where `serious hardship, difficulty or damage` would be caused to the intended intervener.In The Mardina Merchant [1974] 3 All ER 749, the court allowed, under its inherent jurisdiction, the intervention by the Port Authority in an admiralty action in rem because the continu......
-
The "Nagasaki Spirit"
... ... Brandon J had to consider this very question in The Mardina Merchant ... He said at pp 750-751: ... That rule (the English equivalent to O 70 r 16) covers and covers only, I think, cases where the ... ...
- Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd v South African Airways and Pan American World Airways Inc.
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Civil Procedure
...for joinder pursuant to Ord 15 r 6(2)(b)(i) or (ii) were not met. The court applied the approach of Brandon J in The Mardina Merchant[1974] 3 All ER 749 at 750, which is that the court has the inherent jurisdiction “to allow a party to intervene if the effect of an arrest is to cause that p......