The Njegos
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
| Judgment Date | 19 December 1935 |
| Date | 19 December 1935 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
41 cases
-
Owners of the Annefield v Owners of Cargo Lately Laden on Board the Annefield (Annefield, The)
...Hamilton & Co. v. Mackie & Sons (1889) 5 T.L.R. 677, C.A. Merak, The [1965] P. 223; [1965] 2 W.L.R. 250; [1965] 1 All E.R. 230, C.A. Njegos, The [1936] P. Thomas (T. W.) & Co. Ltd. v. Portsea S.S. Co. Ltd. [1912] A.C. 1, H.L.(E.). Vergottis (Andreas) v. Robinson David & Co. ......
-
Thai-Europe Tapioca Service Ltd v Pakistan (The Harmattan) (Hanseat II)
...of the charter party and the payment of demurrage, but not the arbitration clause. No doubt it was governed by English law, see The Niegos 1936 P. 90. But that was its only connection with 5On 2nd December 1971 the Harmatten arrived at Karachi and gave notice of readiness. She had to wait f......
-
The Rena K
...[1975] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 528; [1976] 2 Lloyd's Rep. 29, C.A. Merak, The [1965] P. 223; [1965] 2 W.L.R. 250; [1965] 1 All E.R. 230, C.A. Njegos, The [1936] P. 90. Rasu Maritima S.A. v. Perusahaan Pertambangan Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Negara (Government of the Republic of Indonesia intervening)[1978]......
-
Forsikringsaktieselskapet Vesta v Butcher
...was clearly Norwegian law, and the reinsurance contract should be governed by the same law. In addition he referred to the cases in which The Njegos (1936) Probate 90 has been followed where it has been held that interrelated contracts are prima facie governed by the same 56A little later ......
Get Started for Free
