The Notting Hill
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 30 April 1884 |
| Date | 30 April 1884 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
10 cases
-
Czarnikow Ltd v Koufos (Heron II)
...38 In 1884 The Parana was followed with manifest reluctance by Sir James Hannen, President, and more willingly by the Court of Appeal in The Notting Hill (9 Probate Division 105), which was an action in tort. But in 1902 the Court of Appeal in Dunn v. Bucknall Brothers, to which I have alre......
-
Czarnikow Ltd v Koufos (Heron II)
...capital value of the goods carried) or for any artificial divergence from the principles that govern the assessment of damages. 62 In The Notting Hill L.R. 9 P.D. 105 which was decided in 1884, Hannen J. expressed disagreement with the decision in The Parana but reluctantly felt that he was......
-
Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Miller Steamship Company Pty (Wagon Mound) (No. 2)
... ... Damages depend on the same principle throughout the law of contract and tort: The Notting Hill F6 ; The Argentino F7 ... The overwhelming weight of authority is that there is a general principle governing contract and tort that only those ... ...
-
Liesbosch Dredger (Owners of) v Owners of SS Edison (The Liesbosch)
...V. Kwik Hoo Tong Handes, MaatschappijELR 140 L. T. Rep. 389 (1929) 1 K. B. 400 17 Asp. Mar. Law. Cas. 566 The Notting HillDID=ASPM 5 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 241 (1884) 51 L. T. Rep. 66 9 Prob. Div. 105 Polemis v. Furness Withy and Co.DID=ASPMELR 15 Asp. Mar Law Cas. 398 126 L. T. Rep. 154 (1921)......
Request a trial to view additional results