The Odessa. The Woolston
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judgment Date | 21 December 1914 |
| Date | 21 December 1914 |
| Court | Privy Council |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
22 cases
-
Trendtex v Central Bank of Nigeria
... ... But the guides must not be lightly deserted or cast aside": The Odessa. The Cape Corso , 1915 pages 52, 61-62 ... He may have felt a greater freedom in the Prize Court than a judge of a court of common law to let ... ...
-
Kathryn Bassano (Grantor/Claimant) v Alfred Toft (First Defendant) Peter Biddulph and Peter Biddulph Ltd (Second Defendants) Borro Loan Ltd and Borro Loan 2 Ltd (Third Defendants)
...described in the authorities as a "special interest" or a "special property". The latter description was criticised by the Privy Council in The Odessa [1916] 1 AC 145 at 158–9, in which it was said that the pledgee has no proprietary interest in rem in the pledged chattel, but merely a pers......
-
Palgo Holdings Pty Ltd v Gowans
...at 240. 20Story on Bailments, §287 at 241. 21Ryall v Rolle (1749) 1 Atk 165 at 167 [ 26 ER 107 at 108–109]. 22The Odessa; The Woolston [1916] 1 AC 145 at 158 per Lord 23Story on Bailments, §287 at 241; Paton, Bailment in the Common Law, (1952) ( Paton on Bailment) at 355. 24Paton on Bailmen......
-
Chan Cheng Kum v Wah Tat Bank Ltd
...of property rather than possession. A pledgee is said to have a special property in the goods. Mr Parker referring to The Odessa [1916] AC 145 has rightly pointed out that this is not property in the ordinary sense; the pledgee has not even temporarily the use and enjoyment of the goods but......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Democracy, Liberty and the Prerogative: The Displacement of Inherent Executive Power by Statute
...be taken away by express words'); Re Will of Wi Matua [1908] AC 448, 449 (approving Théberge v Laudry and Cushing v Dupuy); The Odessa [1916] 1 AC 145, 162 ('it must be remembered that the Crown's prerogative can only be abridged by express words or necessary implication'); Re H J Webb & Co......