The Penelope

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date11 May 1928
Date11 May 1928
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Reardon Smith Line Ltd v Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food (Agostino Bertani, Cape Rodney, Queen City, Riverton)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal
    • 28 March 1961
    ...v. S. S. Niki(owners) 1959 1 Queen's Bench, page 238). 40 The appellants relied, in the face of these authorities, on ( The Penelope 1928 Probate, page 180), and since the hearing before us the appellants with the full concurrence of the respondents have referred us to observations of Baron......
  • Pioneer Shipping Ltd v B.T.P. Tioxide Ltd (Nema)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 16 July 1981
    ...an adventure. But it was pointed out that most attempts to invoke strikes as a cause of frustration have in the past failed.The Penelope [1928] P. 180 is almost the only example of success, and in that case the underlying reasoning of the judgment is far from easy to follow, even though the......
  • Byrne v Limerick Steamship Company, Ltd
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 5 February 1946
    ...(4) Lush. 476. (1) L. R. 3 Q. B. 208. (2) [1916] 1 A. C. 486. (3) [1916] 2 A. C. 397. (4) [1935] A. C. 524. (5) [1945] A. C. 221. (6) [1928] P. 180. (7) [1926] A. C. 497. (8) [1943] A. C. 32. (9) 2 Dods. 403. (10) [1913] P. 92. (11) [1933] A. C. 402. (12) 3 C. P. D. 443. (13) [1920] 2 K. B.......
  • Pioneer Shipping Ltd v B.T.P. Tioxide Ltd (Nema)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • Invalid date
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT