The Pensions Regulator v Hermes Parcelnet Ltd
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Judge | Judge Jacobs |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] UKUT 20 (AAC) |
| Subject Matter | Tribunal procedure,practice - evidence,Jacobs,E |
| Court | Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) |
| Published date | 03 March 2021 |
The Pensions Regulator v Hermes Parcelnet Ltd [2021] UKUT 20 (AAC)
1
THE UPPER TRIBUNAL
(ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS CHAMBER)
UPPER TRIBUNAL CASE NO: MISC/0576/2020
[2021] UKUT 20 (AAC)
THE PENSIONS REGULATOR V HERMES PARCELNET LTD
Decided following a public oral hearing via CVP on 21 January 2021
Representatives
The Pensions Regulator
Claire Darwin of counsel, instructed by Carl Dowling,
solicitor at the Pensions Regulator
Hermes Parcelnet Ltd
Christopher Jeans QC and Paul Greatorex of
counsel, instructed by Emma King of Eversheds
Sutherland (International) LLP
DECISION OF UPPER TRIBUNAL JUDGE JACOBS
On appeal from the First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
Reference:
PEN/2019/0489
Decision date:
11 March 2020
As the decision of the First-tier Tribunal involved the making of an error in point of
law, it is SET ASIDE and RE-MADE under section 12(2)(a) and (b)(ii) of the
Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act 2007.
The decision is:
This decision replaces the direction given in paragraph 2 of the Chamber
President’s Directions of 11 March 2020. It does not affect any of the other
directions.
The employment tribunal decision in Leyland v Hermes Parcelnet Ltd is
admissible before the First-tier Tribunal, as are any other employment tribunal
decisions involving Hermes that are produced by a party who considers that
they involve any issue relevant to this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial