The Petrel

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date03 July 1893
Date03 July 1893
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
12 cases
  • Dorrington v London Passenger Transport Board
    • United Kingdom
    • King's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Clark (or Thom) v J. & P. Hutchison, Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session
    • 21 February 1925
    ...Docks Commissioners, 1919 S. C. 676; Bain v. Central Vermont Railway, [1921] 2 A. C. 412, Lord Dunedin, at p. 416. 11 The ‘Petrel,’ELR [1893] P. 320, Sir F. Jeune, P., at p. 12 Merchant Shipping Act, 1894, sec. 742. 13 Marsden's Collisions at Sea, (8th ed.) p. 234. 14 Aktieselskabet Dampski......
  • Kerr v Glasgow Corporation
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Session (Inner House - Second Division)
    • 23 March 1945
    ...Railway Co.UNK, 19 D. 271, Lord Ardmillan (Ordinary) at p. 273;Pollock v. Charles Burt, LimitedELR, [1941] 1 K. B. 121. 4 The "Petrel," [1893] P. 320. 5 Bartonshill Coal Co. v. M'GuireUNK, 3 Macq. 300, Lord Brougham at p. 313. 6 M'Killop v. North British Railway Co.UNK, (1896) 23 R. 768, Lo......
  • Glasgow Corporation v Bruce or Neilson
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 28 July 1947
    ...doctrine now in question, and I incline to the view that on occasion it may be necessary to treat the principle enunciated in The Petrel, (1893) P. 320, and approved by this House in Radcliffe's case, (1939) A.C. 215, as a distinct 26But, however that may be, it is clear that the doctrine ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT