The Queen against Eyton, Esquire, and Others

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1854
Date01 January 1854
CourtCourt of the Queen's Bench

English Reports Citation: 118 E.R. 1188

COURTS OF QUEENS BENCH AND THE COURT OF EXCHEQUER CHAMBER.

The Queen against Eyton, Esquire, and Others

S. C. 18 Jur. 399; (sub nom. In re Surveyors of Tryddyn), 23 L. J. M. C. 45.

the queen against eyton, esquire, and others. 1854. Sect. 95 of the General Highway Act, 5 & 6 W. 4, e. 50 (which enacts that, in the case of an indictment for non-repair of a highway preferred at the Assizes or Quarter Sessions by order of justices as there directed, the costs of the prosecution shall be ordered, by the Judge who tries or the justices of such Quarter Sessions, to be paid out of the rate made and levied in pursuance of the Act in the parish, in which such highway shall be situate) extends, not only to rates made or levied at the time of the order, but to the highway rate in general; and, if there be not sufficient funds in the hands of the surveyors at that time, they must make a rate for the purpose. -The order binds, not only the surveyors in office at the time, but their successors, until the costs be paid.-Such costs are not, within the meaning of sect. 103, penalties, or forfeitures, inflicted or authorized by the Act to be imposed for any offence against the same, nor balances due from a surveyor, nor costs and charges allowed and ordered by the authority of the Act the manner of levying, recovering and applying of which is not thereby otherwise particularly directed. And therefore they cannot be levied by distress, under the proceedings directed by that section. But a mandamus will issue to compel the taking of the proper steps. [S. C. 18 Jur. 399 ; (sub nora. In re Surveyors of Tryddyn), 23 L. J. M. C. 45,] At a General Quarter Sessions for Flintshire, holden 1st July 1852, the Court made an order [391] reciting ati order of special sessions, which directed a prosecution of The Inhabitants of the township of Tryddyn in the parish of Mold, in that county, for non-repair of a highway in the township, the surveyors of the township having appeared to an information preferred by Charles Harrison, and denied the liability ; reciting also that the indictment was preferred by Harrison at Quarter Sessions, and the defendants pleaded Guilty ; and it was "therefore ordered by us, the justices by and before whom the said bill of indictment was tried, that the costs of such prosecution (i) The Report of The Commissioners appointed to inquire into the existing estate of the Corporation of the City of London, &c...

To continue reading

Request your trial
33 cases
  • Van der Linde v Calitz
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...van die dokumente ontvang. Na oorweging van 'n reeks Engelse beslissings kom Lord DE H VILLIERS tot die volgende algemene gevolgtrekkings (bl. 390): 'The public interest must be the paramount consideration in every case in which a party to a suit seeks to prevent relevant official communica......
  • Die Staat v Richter
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...in R v Pretoria Timber Co. (Pty.), Ltd. and Another, 1949 (4) SA op bl. 372, 373; 1950 (3) SA op bl. 178, 179; R v Moosa, 1954 (4) SA op bl. 390; R v Letuli, 1953 (4) SA op bl. 246, 247; R v Peping and Others, 1952 (3) SA G 387; R v Mbili, 1951 (1) SA 110. Dit is die plig van nie net die ve......
  • Cyril Smiedt (Pty) Ltd v Lourens
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...'n daad van insolvensie in terme van art. 8 (g) van Wet 24 van 1936 gepleeg is: H Barlow's (Eastern Province) Ltd v Bouwer, 1950 (4) SA op bl. 390, 391, 392, 393; Chenille Industries v Vorster, 1953 (2) SA op 697; Union Bank of South Africa v Fainman, 1969 W.L.D. op bl. 307. Dit blyk in elk......
  • S v Ackerman
    • South Africa
    • Invalid date
    ...het om op appèl te slaag nie. De Villiers v De Villiers, 1947 (1) SA 635 (AA) op bl. 637 en R v D. D and Another, 1953 (4) SA 384 (AA) op bl. 390. In die verband moet ek in verband met die bewyslas wat op die applikant rus, noem dat in Mall se saak, supra, waar nòg die applikant nòg die Pro......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT