The Soto
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 31 January 1893 |
Date | 31 January 1893 |
Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
The Metropolis
...v. Aitken 18 L. T. Rep. 363 L. Rep. 3 C. P. 320 Re Storer 50 L. T. Rep. 583 26 Ch. Div. 189 The SotoDID=ASPMELR 69 L. T. Rep. 231 7 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 335 (1893) P. 73 Practice Costs Consolidated salvage suits MARITIME LAW CASES. 583 Q.B. DIV.] THE METROPOLIS. [ADM. PROBATE, DIVORCE, AND AD......
-
Allen et al. v. Homan, [1998] B.C.T.C. Uned. 35
...is no hard-and-fast rule that the country solicitor attending the trial of an action in London will not be allowed his costs (The Soto, [1893] P.73); but his attendance, however useful, will not usually be allowed as between party and party (Clark v. Malpas (1862), 31 Beav. 554) . . ., and ......
-
Hamilton v Colhoun
...same period.” J. G. T. (1) Before Gibson and Wright, JJ. (1) 1 New Ir. Jur. R. 275. (2) [1903] 2 I. R. 478. (3) [1901] 2 I. R. 645. (4) [1893] P. 73. (1) [1901] 2 I. R. 645. (2) [1903] 2 I. R. 478. (3) 5 Bing. N. C. 246. (4) 26 Ch. D. 189. (5) [1894] 1 I. R. 135. (6) L. R. 3 C. P. 320. (7) ......