The Soto

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date31 January 1893
Date31 January 1893
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • The Metropolis
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • 27 Junio 1899
    ...v. Aitken 18 L. T. Rep. 363 L. Rep. 3 C. P. 320 Re Storer 50 L. T. Rep. 583 26 Ch. Div. 189 The SotoDID=ASPMELR 69 L. T. Rep. 231 7 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 335 (1893) P. 73 Practice Costs Consolidated salvage suits MARITIME LAW CASES. 583 Q.B. DIV.] THE METROPOLIS. [ADM. PROBATE, DIVORCE, AND AD......
  • Allen et al. v. Homan, [1998] B.C.T.C. Uned. 35
    • Canada
    • British Columbia Supreme Court of British Columbia (Canada)
    • 5 Enero 1998
    ...is no hard-and-fast rule that the country solicitor attending the trial of an action in London will not be allowed his costs (The Soto, [1893] P.73); but his attendance, however useful, will not usually be allowed as between party and party (Clark v. Malpas (1862), 31 Beav. 554) . . ., and ......
  • Hamilton v Colhoun
    • Ireland
    • King's Bench Division (Ireland)
    • 16 Diciembre 1904
    ...same period.” J. G. T. (1) Before Gibson and Wright, JJ. (1) 1 New Ir. Jur. R. 275. (2) [1903] 2 I. R. 478. (3) [1901] 2 I. R. 645. (4) [1893] P. 73. (1) [1901] 2 I. R. 645. (2) [1903] 2 I. R. 478. (3) 5 Bing. N. C. 246. (4) 26 Ch. D. 189. (5) [1894] 1 I. R. 135. (6) L. R. 3 C. P. 320. (7) ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT