The Stettin
Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
Judgment Date | 18 June 1889 |
Date | 18 June 1889 |
Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
24 cases
-
Trafigura Beheer BV v Mediterranean Shipping Company SA
...Two 19th century cases in this long line of authority are Glyn, Mills Currie & Co v East and West India Dock Co (1882) 7 App Cas 591 and The Stettin (1889) 14 PD 142. Sze Hai Tong Bank Ltd v Rambler Cycle Co Ltd [1959] AC 576 is a famous 20th century example. In that case a manufacturer shi......
-
J I MacWilliam Company Inc. v Mediterranean Shipping Company SA
...of the bill of lading is or is not guilty of any breach of contract. It is not necessary to decide it; and I only wish to say that if the Stettin case, (1899), 14 P.D. 142, decides there is such a duty, I think the Stettin case may require consideration. I am not expressing a final opinion......
-
Motis Exports Ltd v Dampskibsselskabet Af 1912 Akieselskab
...notice of any other claim or better title to the goods (see Glyn Mills Currie & Co. v East and West India Dock Co. (1882) 7 App. Cas 591, The Stettin (1889) 14 PD 142, Carlsberg v Wemyss (1915) SC 616 at 624, Sze Hai Tong Bank Ltd v Rambler Cycle Co. Ltd. [1959] AC 576 and particularly the ......
-
JI MacWilliam Company Inc. v Mediterranean Shipping Company Sa (the Rafaela S)
...to the consignee named in a straight bill without production of the bill (sections 8-9). 13 From evidence given to Butt J in The Stettin (1889) 14 PD 142 it is plain that German law had by that date distinguished between an order bill (orderkonnossement) and a straight bill (namenskonnossem......
Request a trial to view additional results