The Subdued Giant: The Predicament of the Law in Harnessing Global Markets

Published date01 September 2009
DOI10.3366/E0954889009000413
Pages302-325
Date01 September 2009
AuthorNorman Mugarura
INTRODUCTION

The article delineates that it is impossible to have any meaningful regional or global market economy in the absence of a proper functioning1

Proper functioning in this respect is simply supposed to mean a system where laws are applied equally and non-discriminatorily – a system that is not inclined to favour one side against the other.

legal system. As such, law as an instrument for social change should provide a framework in which to order a meaningful global economy. It is my submission that global co-operation is necessary to avoid the adverse effect of the prisoner's dilemma, in which each participant is unsure of whether others will cooperate, or engage in behaviour detriment to the stability of the global economy.2

R. Bollen, ‘The International Financial System and Future Global Regulation’, Journal of International Banking Law Regulation (2008): 468.

However, harnessing global initiatives has proven problematic given that states are characterised by different development dynamics, which tends to dictate the symmetric distribution of the engendered benefits.3

In 1977, the then president of Uganda – Ida Amin Dada, pulled Uganda out of the East African Community (EAC) initiative, apparently unhappy with the asymmetric distribution of the benefits generated from the EAC between the three integrated East African countries of Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda. Although Amin was always impulsive in his action, the above move seemed to have been well thought through.

The need for a common legal framework is particularly essential to ensure that different jurisdictions compliment each other in safeguarding against regulatory arbitrage4

This identifies and exploits any inconsistencies in the market and undermines the effectiveness of capital regulation. See C. Mattens, ‘Managing Capital Accord’ (2000) p. 4, available at http://www.riskglossary.com/articles/regualtory_capital.htm.

or regulatory failures.5

Capital adequacy has been criticised that the required eight-percent capital reserve is arbitrary since it doesn't reflect the lows and highs of a business. In an ideal world, a well-designed regulatory system should see capital reserves rising during periods of high profitability and earnings for banks and falling in a recessionary period. See, E. I. Altman and A. Saunders, ‘An Analysis and Critique of the BIS Proposal of Capital Adequacy and Ratings’, 25 Journal of Banking and Finance (2001): 26–8.

Regulatory arbitrage and regulatory failures are common features of an uncoordinated international system. In order for some aspects of a large-scale regulation to be effective, it must be co-ordinated and perhaps formulated on a global basis.6

M. Bagheri and C. Nakajima, ‘Optimal Level of Financial Regulation under the GATS: Regulatory Competition and Co-operation Framework for Capital Adequacy and Disclosure of Information’, 5(2) International Journal of Economic Law (2002): 157.

However, some theorists dismiss globalisation as just a misnomer and an extension of the reach of one local condition or entity7

Janet Dine argues that the concept of transnational corporations is in fact a fallacy because them so-called corporations would have been created as American or British companies in their home countries in accordance with their home laws, and simply by operating in foreign countries doesn't necessarily make them trans-national. See Janet Dine, Companies, International Trade and Human Rights, Cambridge University Press (2005), pp. 1–40; See also K. Siew, ‘Regulatory Challenges in the Development of a Global Securities Market’, 173 Singapore Journal of Legal Studies (2004): 179–80.

over the globe and, by doing so develops the capacity to designate a rival social condition or entity as global.8

B. De Sousa Santos, Towards the New Legal Common Sense: Law, Globalisation and Emancipation, Butterworth LexisNexis (2002), p. 14.

In the current global climate, states have lost their sovereign space as the competition for markets intensifies. The fact that law is surbordinate to power in the event of conflicting interests connotes that law alone cannot help to salvage global relations; and secondly the global system is prone to abuse since it is characteristically contingent upon the dynamics of power and the tendency for the powerful states to assert their leverage to dominate global regimes.9

Vividly captured by the phrase that ‘power is corrupt and absolute power corrupts people absolutely’.

It is my contention that subscribing to global initiatives be preceded by tailored reforms at a local level to enhance the co-existence of the two societies, that is, ‘the local’ and ‘the ‘global’. Using Uganda as a referent point, the paper highlights the tenuous nature of developing economies, which are often deficient in infrastructural development and prone to the vagaries of the putative global era. In light of the above, many developing economies have become marginal participants in the global economy because of the dictates of the global market economy. The systemic global failures are aggregated by the fact that human rights and the environment – the embodiments of human life, have been surbordinated to rapacious global capitalism, generating legitimacy crisis and the increasing antipathy towards the system that is potentially capable of unlocking abundant development opportunities.10

This situation is captured by demonstrations that have been witnessed in almost every part of the globe over what is seen as perpetuation of injustice in the name of trade.

LAW AND GLOBALISATION

Firstly, the twin problems of underdevelopment and its effect have significantly curtailed the local society's potential to create robust national institutions to leverage the adoption of necessary global initiatives.11

Oxfam, World Development Report, ‘Fifty Years of the World Bank and IMF’, Open University Press (2001).

Secondly, the global asymmetries of power and its dynamics have not helped in levelling the ground for an effective economic and political environment in global relations.12

This has had wide implications for every fibre of human life.

I agree entirely with Rosalyn Higgins13

R. Higgins, ‘Problems & Process’, International Law and How We Use it, Oxford University Press, (1994), Chapter 1.

exposition that if the legal system of a society is robust enough, to a large extent disputes are avoided.14

Ibid.

Thus, we hasten to conveniently infer that a distorted legal system is a recipe for chaos, abuse of power, fragrant violation of basic human rights and is overly retrogressive. The foregoing analysis is essential for us to fathom the meaning of law and its efficacy in the management of society. Law is conceptualised as ‘a body of regularised procedures and normative practices that are considered justiciable, that is, susceptible of being enforced by a judicial authority in a given society and contributes to the creation and prevention of disputes, as well as to their settlement through an argumentative discourse coupled by the threat of force.’15

De Sousa Santos, supra note 8.

Law, including international law, has a three fold social function. Firstly, law carries the structures and systems of society through time. Secondly, it inserts the common interests of the society into the behaviour of society members. Thirdly, law establishes possible futures of the society, in accordance with the society's theories, values and purposes. It is a presence of social past, an organising of social present and a conditioning of social future.16

P. Allott, ‘The Concept of International Law’, 3 European Journal of International Law (1999): 31–3.

In simple terms, ‘law’ represents, in the end, a set of events whose common property is sanctioned regularity.17

R. Folk, ‘The Role of Law in World Society: Present Crisis and Futures Prospects’, in World Public Order (1999), p. 133.

The legal system of a society is supposed to provide an operational framework for securing good values that are commonly regarded normative by the society – peace, security, freedom within which the society can function – be ordered or organised. Hence, the paper argues that without law to foster fundamental freedoms, chaos would be loosened upon societies: cars would not safely move on the roads, children would not safely go to school, people would not safely live with one another, aeroplanes would not safely fly and land; and without it perhaps one should also like to add that life would literally stall.18

Higgins, supra note 13.

Law should not only be misconceived as only necessary for deterring proscribed behaviours or solving disputes in the society as many may wish to suppose but fundamentally also, law is about preventing disputes from happening in the first place. Law as culture engenders a change in social attitudes and if the engendered cultural ethos is properly internalised into the society, to a great extent disputes are minimised

In addressing the interaction of globalisation and the law, there are two distinct issues worthy of mention. Firstly, the adoption and implementation across large swathe of the globe of what are now widely accepted as valuable legal norms and approaches. Secondly, the increasing number of areas of the law which are now subject to international agreements more or less binding on the states parties to them. Most obvious are trade laws and the international sale of goods (which among them cover a range of issues from tariffs to contract enforcement and intellectual property rights). Therefore there is need to protect those legal specificities that express and define the values and attitudes of local and national communities.

Likewise national parliaments (governments), courts, human rights, democracy, the environment or global institutions, this paper illuminates that globalisation of markets initially thought to salvage the North-South divide has so far not been able to realise its anticipated objectives.19

The World...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT