The Tommi; The Rothersand
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 15 October 1914 |
| Date | 15 October 1914 |
| Court | Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
- Tunstall v Steigmann
-
The St Tudno [Prize Court]
...tbough not decided, by the Prize Oonrt in the cases of The Tommi and The Riitheriand (13 Asp. Mar. Law Oas 6; 112 L. T. Bup. 257; (1914) P 251) and in the case of The Poona (112 L. T. Rep. 782). True, in the present case the directors and sbarehulders of the British company were not alien e......
-
The Unitas
...flying an enemy flag were thereupon used for that purpose, and after outbreak of war held free of condemnation. So, too, in The TommiELR ([1914] P. 251, 256) it was said: ‘The law with regard to the effect of carrying the flag is perfectly clear, namely, that if a ship does sail under a par......
-
The Poona [Prize Court]
...and Same v. Thomas Tilling LimitedELR 112 L. T. Rep. 324 (1915) 1 K. B. 893 The Tommi and The RothersandELR ante, p. 5 112 L. T. Rep 257 (1914) P. 251 British ship — Cargo — Goods the property of a company domiciled in England MARITIME LAW CASES. 57 Prize Ct.] The Poona. [Prize Ct. March 29......
1 books & journal articles
-
A “switch in time” beyond the nine: historical memory and the constitutional revolution of the 1930s
...‘‘necessity’’ ofadding the Constitution’s first ten amendments ‘‘does not now seem soapparent as it did when they were adopted’’ (Fenton, 1914, p. 251). TheFirst Amendment and the Bill of Rights did not yet occupy a ‘‘privilegedposition’’ within America’s constitutional memory.The protection......