The Valeria

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date14 January 1920
Date14 January 1920
CourtProbate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
4 cases
  • The Pellworm
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 13 February 1922
    ...have no property in the 3hips, and are not entitled to their appraised value: The Valeria, 15 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 218; 122 L. T. Rep. 751; (1920) P. 81. Under the Treaty of Versailles the ships were ceded to Great Britain, end that being so, there is no reason for handing them over to the Du......
  • The Pellworm
    • United Kingdom
    • Probate, Divorce and Admiralty Division
    • 21 April 1920
    ...Anna CatharinaENR 5 C. Rob. 15 The Dusseldorf ante, p. 84 122 L. T. Rep. 237 (1919) p. 245 The ValeriaELR ante, p. 55 122 L. T. Rep. 751 (1920) P. 81 The Anne 1818, 3 Wheaton's Reports U.S. 435 The BangorELR 114 L. T. Rep. 1212 (1916) P. 181 The Twee GebroedersENR (3 C. Rob. 162) The Zamora......
  • The Valeria
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 25 January 1921
    ...15 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 123; L. T. Rep. 732; (1920) A. C. 1034) distinguished. Judgment of Sir Henry Duke, P. (reported 122 L. T. Rep. 751; (1920) P. 81) affirmed. 218 MARITIME LAW CASES. PRIV. CO.] THE VALERIA. [PRIV. CO. Oct. 29, Nov. 1, 1920, ami Jan. 25, 1921. (Present: The Right Hons. Lo......
  • The Dusseldorf
    • United Kingdom
    • Privy Council
    • 29 July 1920
    ...C. Rob. 162 The Vrow Anna CatharinaENR 5 C. Rob. 15 The AnnaENR 5 C. Rob. 373 The Lokken 26th July 1918 The ValeriaELR 122 L. T. Rep. 751 (1920) P. 81 The PellwormDID=ASPMELR 14 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 490 123 L. T. Rep. 685 (1920) P. 347 The FranciskaENR 10 Moore, P. C. 73 Prize Court Territori......
1 books & journal articles
  • Ownership by Agreement
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Political Studies No. 63-4, October 2015
    • 1 October 2015
    ...place, then how could it be rational to support a right that doesnot, at a minimum, ensure that connection in perpetuity? Why, as Tawney (1920, p. 81) putit, would people wish for ‘the parasite which kills the organism that produced it’? This is notto say that people would reject rights tha......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT