The W. H. No. 1 and The Knight Errant
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1910 |
| Year | 1910 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
3 cases
-
The Koursk
...Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 210 107 L. T. Rep. 179 (1912) A. C. 634, 657 The Knight ErrantDID=ASPMELR 11 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 407 102 L. T. Rep. 643 (1910) P. 199 The FranklandDID=ASPMELR 9 Asp. Mar. Law Cas., 196 84 L. T. Rep. 395 (1901) P. 161 King v. HoareENR 13 M. & W. 494 Buckland v. JohnsonENR 1......
-
The Devonshire
...Law Cas. 284 (1892) 68 L. T. Rep. 99 (1893) A. C. 38 The Knight ErrantDID=ASPMELRELR 11 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 497 (1910) 102 L.T. Rep. 643 (1910) P. 199 103 L. T. Rep. 677 (1911) A.C. 30 The Drumlanrig 11 Asp. Mar. Law. Cas. 451 (1910) 103 L. T. Rep. 773 (1911) A. C. 16 Tug and tow — Admiralty......
-
Owners, Master, and Crew of the Lightshsip Comet v Owners of Hopper Barge WH (No. 1)
...and the Comet, a lightship in the Crosby Channel of the river Mersey. The case is reported 11 Asp. Mar. Law Cas. 407; 102 L. T. Rep. 643; (1910) P. 199. The Court of Appeal found the tug alone to blame. The owners of the lightship appealed. Bailhache, K.C. and Bateson, K.C., for the appella......