Theology and international order: Questions, challenges and explorations

AuthorWilliam Bain
DOIhttp://doi.org/10.1177/17550882221144471
Published date01 February 2023
Date01 February 2023
Subject MatterForum
https://doi.org/10.1177/17550882221144471
Journal of International Political Theory
2023, Vol. 19(1) 147 –156
© The Author(s) 2022
Article reuse guidelines:
sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/17550882221144471
journals.sagepub.com/home/ipt
Theology and international
order: Questions, challenges
and explorations
William Bain
National University of Singapore, Singapore
Abstract
Theology is a neglected resource in international relations scholarship; it is, more often
than not, characterised as a threat to political order because it is seen as a cradle of
fanaticism and irrationality. Postsecular scholarship challenges this view by exploring
the persistence of theological ideas and religious belief in political discourse and
practice. Political Theology of International Order is my own contribution to this type of
scholarship. This article engages responses from five distinguished scholars. It considers
the implications of taking theology seriously when theorising international order; the
veracity of narratives that frame the study of international relations; and new directions
and possibilities that arise out of the book.
Keywords
English School, international order, nominalism, political theology, religion, secularism
The idea of order is part of the constitutive vocabulary of International Relations; it is,
along with power, anarchy, security, cooperation, justice and so forth, integral to how we
think and speak about the subject. If this proposition is both obvious and uncontroversial,
suggesting that theology illuminates the character of international order is great deal less
so. Mingling theology with politics, we are regularly told, is a foolhardy enterprise that
opens the door to irrationality, fanaticism and violence. Keeping these domains separate
is what distinguishes Western liberal democracies from the rest; they have learned, at
great expense, anguish and suffering, that excluding questions of religion from the eve-
ryday goings-on of politics is necessary to keep the primordial impulses of political
theology at bay (Lilla, 2007: 3–5). But this self-congratulatory story elides the extent to
Corresponding author:
William Bain, Department of Political Science, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, National University of
Singapore, AS1 04-43, 11 Arts Link, Singapore 117573, Singapore.
Email: wbain@nus.edu.sg
1144471IPT0010.1177/17550882221144471Journal of International Political TheoryBain
research-article2022
Forum

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT