THOMAS JUDGE Applicant against UNITED KINGDOM
| Jurisdiction | Scotland |
| Neutral Citation | 2011 SCCR 241 |
| Year | 2011 |
| Date | 2011 |
| Court | Unspecified Court (Scotland) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
9 cases
-
Rr, Petitioner
...ECR I-2875 JC, Petr [2018] HCJAC 77; 2020 JC 155; 2020 SLT 542; 2020 SCCR 151 Judge v UK (35863/10) [2011] ECHR 367; (2011) 52 EHRR SE17; 2011 SCCR 241 Katz v Sós (C-404/07) ECLI:EU:C:2011:583; [2008] ECR I-7607 Kemp, Petrs 1982 JC 29; 1982 SLT 357; 1982 SCCR 1 Kerseboom v HM Advocate [2016......
-
The Reverend Donald Smith As Moderator Of The General Assembly Of The Free Church Of Scotland And Others V. The Reverend John Morrison And Others
...2012 SCCR 88; 2012 SCL 130 and [2011] HCJAC 46; 2011 JC 252; 2011 SLT 722; 2011 SCCR 300; 2011 SCL 569 Judge v UKUNK (2011) 52 EHRR SE17; 2011 SCCR 241 Kiam v MGN LtdUNKELRWLRUNK [2002] EWCA Civ 43; [2003] QB 281; [2002] 3 WLR 1036; [2002] 2 All ER 219 Kingswell v RUNKUNKUNK [1985] HCA 72; ......
-
Appeal Following Upon A Reference From The Scottish Criminal Cases Review Commission
...the jury’s verdict is not given in isolation but within a framework which includes the terms of the charge (Judge v United Kingdom 2011 SCCR 241). The framework in the appellant’s case had been inadequate and accordingly the charge and verdict had breached the appellant’s Article 6 right. [......
-
R.m.m. V. Her Majesty's Advocate
...requirements of a reasoned judgment under Article 6 ECHR (cf the decision of the ECtHR in Judge v United Kingdom reported domestically at 2011 SCCR 241). It was a "case specific argument" to the effect that in the peculiar circumstances of this trial there was such ambiguity in the jury's v......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Victim representation for sexual history evidence in Ireland: A step towards or away from meeting victims’ procedural justice needs?
...her sexual partner into certain sexual positions’; and (d) ‘used specific words of encouragement’ (Judge v UK, Application No. 35863/10, 2011 SCCR 241 at 28; McGlynn, 2017). McGlynn (2017: 391) argues that these judgments ‘undermine the principles of autonomy and free 428 Criminology & Crim......
-
Rape Trials and Sexual History Evidence
...in Canada similarity evidence is admissible, it is not permitted to demonstrate consent.71. Judge vUK, Application No 35863/10, 2011 SCCR 241 at 28. For a discussion of the Scottish context, see Campbell andCowan above n. 52.72. Ibid. Note also that the European Court stated in Schenk vSwit......