Thomas Mansell fuit inde del murder de un Robert Fayre & sur ceo il fuit araigne

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1664
Date01 January 1664
CourtCourt of Common Pleas

English Reports Citation: 123 E.R. 376

DEL COMMON-BANK

Thomas Mansell fuit inde del murder de un Robert Fayre & sur ceo il fuit araigne

CLIII. Thomas Mansell fuit inde del murder de un Robert Fayre & sur ceo il fuit araigne al Seaaiona per Newgate & plede non culpable, & le Jury charge sur luy & auters reveign pur dire lour verdit fuit fait Cum per les parols del record il appiert les contents ;da que aont come eusua, acil. Et super hoc quiBsttum per Cur hie ide jur. prasdict. utrum de veredict. suo reddend. concordat, fuerunt, necne qui quidem Juratorea responderunt quod concordat easent & quod Thomas Clark primus homo de eadem jurat, nominal-, loqueretur pro illis, & super hoc prtefatus Thomas Clark quteutua si prsedictua Thomas Mansell alias Manson culpabilia ait de felonia & murdro praedict. 1 ANDERSON, 104. 377 necite, dixit quod prsadictus Thomaa Manael culpabilis eat de homicidio & felonica interfectione diet. Roberti Fayre vocat. man-slaughter auper quo refiduum jurat, prsedict. statim dixerunt quod ipai non concordat, fuerunt tale veredict. reddere quale idem Tho. Clark declarasset & dixiaset, & quia verdict, illud Cur hie incertum vicioaum & minime Bufficiens in lege videbatur, qutesitum est de prsefat. Thoma Mansel si velit de jurat, pradiet. necnon de veredict. suo in forma pnedict. reddito exonerari necne, qui dixit quod ipse contentus fuit de jurat, ilia necnon de veredict. suo predict, in forma predict reddit. exonerari, & sic idem Thomas ex aasensu suo proprio de jurat, prmdict. per Cur hie exoneratur, aprea quel le dit Thomaa Mansel [104] fuit trie aur mesme le inditeraent per tiovel Jure pur c que tout que le Jure fist encounter le dit Mansel fuit voyd, & le reason pur c que aur le matter est nul verdit done; car doit estre le Act & verdit de tout le Jure quel...

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • OG v JK
    • New Zealand
    • Family Court
    • 8 December 2016
    ...for personal orders requiring Mrs VK to return to New Zealand for rehabilitation. 9 The grounds for the application for orders under ss 105 and 103 of the Act (a) JK had acted unreasonably in exercising his powers pursuant to the EPA and would continue to do so if given the opportunity; (b)......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT