Thomas Raphael, THE ANTI-SUIT INJUNCTION Oxford: Oxford University Press (www.oup.com), 2008. lxxv + 483 pp. ISBN 9780199287321. £95.

Pages544-545
AuthorKirsty J Hood
DOI10.3366/E136498090900078X
Date01 September 2009
Published date01 September 2009

An English anti-suit injunction essentially prohibits a person from pursuing court proceedings in another forum. Since at least as early as the case of Young v Barclay (1846) 8 D 774, the Scots courts seem to have considered that they likewise have the power (in certain circumstances) to interdict a party from raising, or continuing with, an action in another forum. In legal theory, such orders are directed against an individual: but, practically, it cannot be denied that they impact upon proceedings before another forum. In the introductory section of his welcome monograph, The Anti-Suit Injunction, Thomas Raphael acknowledges that such orders are primarily a feature of the Common Law world (but they have also been utilised in “mixed” jurisdictions such as Scotland), and that it is generally lawyers from the Civil Law who complain that anti-suit injunctions are an interference with another forum's sovereign right to determine whether proceedings may be commenced (or continued with) there. These differing attitudes spring, suggests Raphael, from a deeper divide between Civil Law and Common Law jurisdictions, as to whether to afford “priority to public judicial authority rather than private justice” (17).

After introductory remarks (which include an informative historical overview), Raphael provides very useful analysis of the anti-suit injunction. A discussion of the general principles is followed by examination of different types of anti-suit injunctions, such as non-contractual, contractual, and quasi-contractual. Raphael argues that, within the category of non-contractual anti-suit injunctions, there may be “alternative forum” cases (where a claim might be brought in either England or in a foreign forum), or “single forum” cases (where the foreign forum is the only one in which proceedings might be brought). Particular care, it has been acknowledged by the courts, must be exercised in a “single forum” case, since here the order pronounced by the English court will effectively determine whether or not the claim may be brought in the foreign forum.

Contractual anti-suit injunctions are those sought where there is a relevant “exclusive forum clause”. Here the anti-suit injunction is perhaps seen at its most defensible – if it has been agreed that disputes must be litigated in England, or referred to an English arbitration, the actings of one party in raising court proceedings elsewhere can readily be viewed as a breach of contract. It is therefore...

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT