Thomas v The Queen
| Jurisdiction | UK Non-devolved |
| Court | Privy Council |
| Judgment Date | 1978 |
| Year | 1978 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
16 cases
-
Walker and Another v The Queen ; Douglas v The Queen ; Glanville v The Queen
...for Jamaica [1993] 3 W.L.R. 298, P.C. Surat (Nawab of), In re (1854) 9 Moo. P.C. 88, P.C. Thomas v. The Queen [1980] A.C. 125; [1978] 3 W.L.R. 927; [1979] 2 All E.R. 142, The following additional cases were cited in argument: Abbott v. Attorney-General of Trinidad and Tobago [1979] 1 W.L.R.......
-
Heron (Michael) v DPP and Attorney General for Jamaica
...Kerr v The Director of Public Prosecutions and the Attorney-General (1987) 24 JLR 1. This case followed the decision of The Board in Thomas v The Queen [1980] A.C. 125. These cases illustrate the constitutional prohibition in Sec. 32(4) of the Constitution that there should be no enquiry b......
-
Ramdeen v The State
...Act], the Judicial Committee's role is confined to acting as an appellate court: see In re Nawab of Surat (1854) 9 Moo PC 88 and Thomas v The Queen [1980] AC 125. (p 44C-D) …. It is nevertheless apparent that, in the light of the judgment in Pratt…., unless the sentences of these defendants......
-
Stevens v R
... ... Laurie Stevens Appellant and The Queen Respondent [2005] HCA 65 Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Kirby, Callinan AND Heydon JJ B20/2005 HIGH COURT OF ... But they ‘themselves set the standard of what is reasonable in the circumstances.’ 17 And, as Windeyer J pointed out in Thomas v The Queen 18 , it is not the task of juries ‘to analyse their own mental processes.’ Nor is a reasonable doubt ‘confined to a “rational ... ...
Get Started for Free
