Thornton v Howe

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date01 January 1862
Date01 January 1862
CourtHigh Court of Chancery

English Reports Citation: 54 E.R. 1042

ROLLS COURT

Thornton
and
Howe

31 L. J. Ch. 767; 6 L. T. 525; 8 Jur. (N.S.) 663; 10 W. R. 642.

thohnton v- HowE- April 28, May 29, 1862. [31 L. J. Ch. 767 ; 6 L. T. 525 ; 8 Jur. (N. S.) 663 ; 10 W. R. 642.] A trust " for printing, publishing and propagating the sacred writings " of Joanna Southcote, is a charitable trust, which if given out of pure personalty will be enforced and regulated. In respect t& charitable trusts for printing and circulating works of a religious tendency, this Court makes no distinction between one sect and another, unless their tenets include doctrines adverse to the foundation of all religion or be subversive of all morality, in which case this Court will declare the bequest void. The testatrix, Ann Essam, by her will dated in 1843, bequeathed as follows : - " And as to all the rest, residue and remainder of my estate, both real and personal, w hatsoever and wheresoever, that I may be possessed of, after the payment of all my just debts, funeral and testamentary expenses, I give, devise and bequeath the same unto Benjamin Howe, of No. 107 Old Street, St. Luke's, London, engineer, to hold to him, his heirs and assigns for ever. But it is my express wish and desire that the produce .of all my said real and personal estate, so devised and bequeathed to him and his \ heirs, shall be applied for and towards the printing, publishing and propagation of I the sacred writings of the late Joanna Southcote ; and I hereby constitute and appoint 'the said John Spencer sole executor of this my will." The testatrix died in 1844. The heiress at law of the testatrix filed this bill in 1861 against Howe and the Attorney-General, and it charged as follows : - "The Plaintiff charges that the trust for the printing [15] and publishing and propagation of the sacred writings of the late Joanna Southcote is either void in law, on the ground that the writings in question are of a blasphemous and profane character, or that the trust so declared is a trust for the propagation of doctrines subversive or contrary to the Christian religion, or as being a trust for a charitable purpose within the Act of 9 Geo. 2, c. 36. " The Plaintiff charges that the writings of Joanna Southcote, which are referred to in the will of the testatrix, purport to declare, maintain or reveal that she was with child by the Holy Ghost, and that a second Shiloh or Messiah was about to be born of her body, and in other parts thereof purport to be or contain revelations made to her by the Holy Ghost or by divine inspiration, and to maintain or declare that she was moved or inspired by the Holy Spirit to write the same, and that in other parts they are of a blasphemous and profane character." The bill prayed, amongst other things, a declaration " that the trust declared by the testatrix's will of her real...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
3 books & journal articles
  • SHIFTING PARADIGM OF INVESTMENT BY CHARITIES
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2018, December 2018
    • 1 December 2018
    ...to faith-based charities, the courts have held that the law will not discriminate between different religions. See Thornton v Howe(1862) 54 ER 1042 at 1044. 43 In alignment with this broad sweep approach, all expended charitable donations are tax-free in the hands of the recipient charity b......
  • Religious charitable status and public benefit in Australia.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 35 No. 3, December 2011
    • 1 December 2011
    ...Review 159. (70) Gilmour v Coats [1949] AC 426, 459 (Lord Reid). (71) See, eg, the judicial and academic treatment of Thornton v Howe (1862) 31 Beav 14; 54 ER 1042, discussed in Pauline Ridge, 'Legal Neutrality, Public Benefit and Religious Charitable Purposes: Making Sense of Thornton v Ho......
  • A CHARITY IN ALL BUT LAW: THE POLITICAL PURPOSE EXCEPTION AND THE CHARITABLE SECTOR.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 42 No. 2, April 2019
    • 1 January 2019
    ...Law: International Perspectives (n 12) 95. The presumption in England and Wales was removed: see Charities Act 2011 (UK) s 4(2). (145) (1862) 31 Beav 14; 54 ER 1042, 1044. See Juliet Chevalier-Watts, 'Charity Law, the Advancement of Religion and Public Benefit: Will the United Kingdom Be th......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT