Thornton v Thornton
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1885 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
8 cases
-
The Atlantic Star; Atlantic Star (Owners) v Bona Spes (Owners)
...of actions. The course of procedure in San Francisco might have been such as to give advantages to the defendants. Both in Thornton v. Thornton 11 P.D. 176 and In re Norton's Settlement [1908] 1 Ch. 471, the test of mere balance of convenience was not accepted. In the latter case a stay of ......
-
MacShannon v Rockware Glass Ltd
...cases: McHenry v. Lewis, 22 Ch.D. 397; Peruvian Guano Co. v. Bockwoldt, 23 Ch.D. 225; Hyman v. Helm, 24 Ch.D. 531; Thornton v. Thornton, 11 P.D. 176; and Logan v. Bank of Scotland (No. 2) [1906] 1 K.B. 141, 150, 151." 6The positive condition which must be satisfied to justify staying an ac......
-
Muduroglu Ltd v T. C. Ziraat Bankasi
...cases: McHenry v. Lewis 22 CH.d. 397; Peruvian Guano Co. v. Rockwoldt [1883] 23 Ch.D. 225; Hyman v. Helm [1883] 24 Ch.D. 531; Thornton v. Thornton 11 P.D. 176; and Logan v. Bank of Scotland (No. 2) [1906] 1 K.B. 141, 150, 151. I do not think that the cases upon service out of the jurisdict......
-
The Atlantic Star; Atlantic Star (Owners) v Bona Spes (Owners)
...of actions. The course of procedure in San Francisco might have been such as to give advantages to the defendants. Both in Thornton v. Thornton 11 P.D. 176 and In re Norton's Settlement [1908] 1 Ch. 471, the test of mere balance of convenience was not accepted. In the latter case a stay of ......
Request a trial to view additional results