Tito v Waddell (No. 2); Tito v Attorney General; Ocean Island (No. 2)
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1977 |
| Date | 1977 |
| Court | Chancery Division |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
360 cases
-
Rhone and Another v Stephens (executrix)
...principle of benefit and burden" distilled by Sir Robert Megarry, Vice-Chancellor from the authorities in Tito v Waddell (No 2)ELR ((1977) 1 Ch 106). His Lordship was not prepared to recognise the "pure principle" that any party deriving any benefit from a conveyance had to accept any burde......
-
Sheldon and Others v R H M Outhwaite (Underwriting Agencies) Ltd and Others
...his Lordship had to disagree with the contrary view expressed obiter by Sir Robert Megarry, Vice-Chancellor, in Tito v Waddell (No 2)ELR ((1977) Ch 106, 245). ...
-
Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter
...Ltd [1996] AC 102. Test Claimants in the FII Group Litigation v R & C Commrs [2020] UKSC 47; [2022] AC 1. Tito v Waddell (No. 2) [1977] Ch 106. Williams v Fanshaw Porter & Hazelhurst (a firm) [2004] EWCA Civ 157; [2004] 1 WLR 3185. Wisniewski v Central Manchester HA [1998] PIQR P324. Zipvit......
-
Radford v De Froberville
... ... [1973 R. No. 1446] ... 1977 March 8, ... Oliver J ... Tito v. Waddell (No. 2) [ 1977 ] Ch. 106 ... of damages is that there are so few general principles and that such as there are have, at ... 106 (better known, perhaps, as the Ocean Island case). Mr. Razi was good enough to supply ... ...
Request a trial to view additional results
5 firm's commentaries
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 1-5, 2021)
...24, Grand River Enterprises v. Burnham (2005), 197 O.A.C. 168, Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, 2002 SCC 79, Tito v. Waddell (No. 2), [1977] 3 All E.R. 129, Canadian National Railway Co. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 SCC 40, Heritage Capital Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 2016 SCC 19, TE......
-
Court Of Appeal Summaries (November 1-5, 2021)
...24, Grand River Enterprises v. Burnham (2005), 197 O.A.C. 168, Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, 2002 SCC 79, Tito v. Waddell (No. 2), [1977] 3 All E.R. 129, Canadian National Railway Co. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 SCC 40, Heritage Capital Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 2016 SCC 19, TE......
-
COURT OF APPEAL SUMMARIES (NOVEMBER 1-5, 2021)
...24, Grand River Enterprises v. Burnham (2005), 197 O.A.C. 168, Wewaykum Indian Band v. Canada, 2002 SCC 79, Tito v. Waddell (No. 2), [1977] 3 All E.R. 129, Canadian National Railway Co. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2014 SCC 40, Heritage Capital Corp. v. Equitable Trust Co., 2016 SCC 19, TE......
-
Structured Finance and Securitisation 2010: Country Q&A - Hong Kong
...if it satisfies three certainties: Certainty of intention. There must be a manifest intention to create a trust (Tito v Waddell (No. 2) [1977] Ch 106). Certainty of objects. The trust must be for ascertainable beneficiaries (Re Vandervell's Trusts (No. 2) [1974] Ch 269). Certainty of subjec......
Request a trial to view additional results
40 books & journal articles
-
RE-EXAMINING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MUTUAL PROMISES IN CONTRACT LAW.
...First outlined in Newcombe v Newcombe (1934) 34 SR (NSW) 446, 450 (Jordan CJ) ('Newcombe'). (46) First outlined in Tito v Waddell[No 2] [1977] 1 Ch 106, 297 (Megarry V-C) as a test to determine whether an instrument grants unqualified or conditional rights. It has since been cited by author......
-
AN ACCOUNT OF ACCOUNTS
...at p 114. 57[1927] VLR 134. 58 See Robinson v Abbott(1893) 20 VLR 346; Palmisano v Hyman (FCA) (30 March 1977); and Tito v Waddell (No 2)[1977] Ch 106. 59Nocton v Lord Ashburton[1914] AC 932 at 956. 60Nocton v Lord Ashburton[1914] AC 932 at 958. 61[1934] 3 DLR 465. 62Brickenden v London Loa......
-
The Continuing Value of Relief for Directors' Breach of Duty
...a director in form112 [1988] BCLC 104; noted L.S. Sealy (1987) 46 CLJ 217. To support his view the judge drew uponTito vWaddell (No 2) [1977] Ch 106.113 See, most notably, Millett LJ’s pronouncement in Bristol and West Building Society vMothew[1998] Ch 1 18: ‘Breach of fiduciary obligation, ......
-
Defects
...Toulmin CMG QC (24 Const LJ 103). 419 Director of War Service Homes v Harris [1968] Qd R 275 at 278, per Gibbs J; Tito v Waddell (No 2) [1977] Ch 106 at 332, per Sir Robert Megarry V-C; Oxford University Press v John Stedman Design Group (1990) 34 Con LR 1 at 86–87, per HHJ Esyr Lewis QC; R......
Request a trial to view additional results