Todd v Davison

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1971
Year1971
CourtHouse of Lords
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
14 cases
  • Mills v Commissioners of Inland Revenue
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 12 February 1974
    ...to mature earlier, she had not reached it. She was in the custody of her father (see Hewer v. Bryant [1970] 1 Q.B. 357;Todd v. Davison [1972] A.C. 392), who was beyond doubt in law and in fact her natural guardian. She was incapable of making a will or a settlement, or indeed making any con......
  • Commissioners of Inland Revenue v Mills (Hayley)
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 17 October 1972
    ...children are said to mature earlier, she had not reached it. She was in the custody of her father (see Hewer v. Bryant 1970 1 Q. 3. 357; Todd v. Davison 1972 A. C. 392) who was beyond doubt in law and in fact her natural guardian. She was incapable of waking a will or a settlement or indeed......
  • Fountain v Alexander
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Brown et al. v. University of Alberta Hospital et al.,
    • Canada
    • Court of Queen's Bench of Alberta (Canada)
    • 20 March 1997
    ...[1972] S.C.R. 387, refd to. [para. 17]. Hewer v. Bryant, [1969] 3 All E.R. 578 (C.A.), refd to. [para. 34]. Todd v. Davison, [1971] 1 All E.R. 994 (H.L.), refd to. [para. Blair v. Fundytus (1978), 11 A.R. 243; 5 Alta. L.R.(2d) 346 (T.D.), refd to. [para. 34]. Millard v. Millard and Calgary ......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT