Toepfer (Alfred C.) v Continental Grain Company (Penquer)

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1973
Year1973
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
26 cases
  • Gill & Duffus S.A. v Berger & Company Inc. (No. 2) (Salland)
    • United Kingdom
    • House of Lords
    • 15 Diciembre 1983
    ...GSC certificate was conclusive that the 445 tonnes with which it dealt conformed to the contract. He held, on the authority of Toepfer v. Continental Grain Co. [1974] 1 Lloyd's Rep. 11 that it was and he restored the award of the umpire as respects this part of the 24It appears from the ju......
  • Harrisons & Crosfield (NZ) Ltd v Lian Aik Hang(a firm)
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 26 Febrero 1987
    ... ... officer of Sanitarium Health Food Company, was the person who placed the order for the ... shall be final and they relied on Alfred C Toepfer v Continental Grain Co [1974] 1 ... ...
  • Gill & Duffus S.A. v Berger & Company Inc. (No. 2) (Salland)
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • Invalid date
  • Bernhard Schulte GmbH & Company Kg and Others v Nile Holdings Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 11 Mayo 2004
    ...was little issue between the parties about this so that I need do no more than refer to the authorities, which make it plain: Toepfer v Continental Grain [1974] 1 LLR 11(CA), Campbell v Edwards [1976] 1 WLR 403, Jones v Sherwood [1992] 1 WLR 277 (CA), Nikko Hotels v MEPC [1996] 1 LLR 370, a......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • Know Your Position: An Overview of the Role of the Certifier
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 19 Julio 2018
    ...5-066. 18. (1871) L.R. 13 Eq. 1. 19. See Bailey, Construction Contracts, vol. I, ch. 5.108. See also Toepfer v Continental Grain Co [1974] 1 Lloyd's Rep 11 at 13, per Lord Denning MR. 20. [2003] BLR 412. 21. See Bailey, Construction Contracts, ch. S.142. Please click here to view previous i......
1 books & journal articles
  • Contract administration
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume I - Third Edition
    • 13 Abril 2020
    ...must be exercised reasonably and with advance notice to both parties (at 439 [124]–440 [129]). 330 Toepfer v Continental Grain Co [1974] 1 Lloyd’s Rep 11 at 13, per Lord Denning MR. See also Mossop Group Pty Ltd v 1KW Adelaide Pty Ltd [2018] SASC 186 at [26], per Doyle J. 331 See, eg, Emson......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT