Tomalin v S. Pearson & Son Ltd
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Judgment Date | 1909 |
| Year | 1909 |
| Date | 1909 |
| Court | Court of Appeal |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
38 cases
-
Parno v SC Marine Pte Ltd
...effect. Following some of the earlier English cases in this area ( R v Jameson & Ors [1896] 2 QB 425; Tomalin v S Pearson & Son Ltd [1909] 2 KB 61), Scott LJ, delivering the leading judgment of the court, said: It is quite clear that the principle of law is that our territorial legislation ......
- Mynott v Barnard
-
Keegan v Dawson
...Constitution, which continued the Act in force in the Irish Free State, did not alter its scope. Tromalin v. S. Pearson & Son, Ltd.,ELR [1909] 2 K. B. 61; Schwartz v. India Rubber, Gutta Percha and Telegraph Works Co., Ltd.,ELR [1912] 2 K. B. 299, and dictum in Krzus v. Crow's Nest Pass Coa......
- Schwartz v India Rubber, Gutta Percha and Telegraph Works Company
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
The Conflict of Laws and Statutes: The International Operational of Legislation Dealing With Matters of Civil Law in the United Kingdom and Australia
...In English Product Liability Law: A Comparison With The American System’(1988) 62 Tulane Law Review 353; Tomalin vS. Pearson & Son, Ltd [1909] 2 KB 61; and Clark vOceanic Contractors Inc [1983] 2 AC 130 per Lord Scarman at 141 and 144–146, and LordWilberforce at 152; and cf St J.P. Lanagan,......
-
CROSS-BORDER MOTOR ACCIDENTS AND THE MOTOR VEHICLES
...history of a statute to discern whether the statute is intended to have extra-territorial effect. See Tomalin v S Pearson & Son Ltd[1909] 2 KB 61. 31 British Malaya means the Straits Settlements, the Federated Malay States and the Unfederated Malay States. 32 [1964] 30 MLJ 307. 33 In the Ni......