Topliss v Green

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Date1992
Year1992
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
3 cases
  • McCoy and McCoy v McGill and Roe
    • Ireland
    • High Court
    • 6 October 2008
    ...McGILL AND TIMOTHY ROE DEFENDANTS ALAN WIBBERLEY BUILDING LTD v INSLEY 1999 1 WLR 894 O'DONNELL v RYAN 1856 4 ICLR 44 TOPLIS v GREEN 1992 EGCS 20 SEECKTS v DERWENT 2004 EWCA CIV 393 BOYD GIBBINS LTD v HOCKHAM 1966 199 EG 229 KENNY v LA BARTE 1902 2 IR 63 COOK v JD WETHERSPOON PLC 2006 2 P &......
  • (1) Richard Lanfear & (2) Mary Lanfear v Margaret Chandler
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 20 November 2013
    ...such as topographical features. In such circumstances, the question is what would the reasonable layman think he was buying?: see Topliss v Green [1992] EGCS 20. Reference to extrinsic evidence is therefore part of the process of construing the transfer or conveyance; not an alternative to ......
  • Robert CECIL SEECKTS and PAUL DERWENT and JANET DERWENT
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 30 March 2004
    ...of any parcel." (p 1473H – 1474B). 21 The relevant principles were conveniently summarised by Butler-Sloss LJ in Topliss v Green [1992] EGCS 20:- "…One looks at the language used in the contract, the content of the plan and in the context the facts relating to the locus in quo, if it is in ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT