Toprak Enerji Sanayi A.S. v Sale Tilney Technology Plc

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
CourtQueen's Bench Division
Judgment Date1994
Date1994
Year1994

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
22 cases
  • Yorkshire Regional Health Authority v Fairclough Building Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 1 November 1996
    ...not contemplate that other cases of substitution where that crucial feature is absent should also be included. 81 In Toprak Enerji Sanayi A.S. v. Sale Tilney Technology plc [1994] 1 Ll.R. 303 Judge Diamond Q.C. said merely that the claim brought by the succeeding party, Seniteri, was "clear......
  • Roberts v Gill & Company and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 19 May 2010
    ...The Choko Star seems to be the first case in which it was necessary (because of the wrong turning taken in Toprak Enerji Sanayi AS v Sale Tilney Technology plc [1994] 1 WLR 840) to consider whether the transmission of a pending cause of action had implications under the Limitation Act. Prev......
  • Peter James Horsman v HM Attorney General
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 30 April 2026
    ...of universal succession, rather than it simply being an actual or deemed incidence of such succession. 33 Toprak Enerji Sanayi v Sale Tilney Technology plc [1994] 1 WLR 840 was a case concerning the effect of the merger of Turkish companies, governed by Article 151 of the Turkish Commercial......
  • Global Container Lines Ltd v Bonyad Shipping Company [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 12 June 1998
    ...Fashions Ltd v Legal and General Assurance Society LtdUNK [1995] BCC 510. Thynne v ThynneELR [1955] P 272. Toprak Enerji Sanayi AS v Sale Tilney Technology plcWLR [1994] 1 WLR 840. Yorkshire Regional Health Authority v Fairclough Building Ltd [1996] CLC 366; [1996] 1 WLR 210. Proceedings — ......
  • Get Started for Free