Toprak Enerji Sanayi A.S. v Sale Tilney Technology Plc

JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date1994
Year1994
Date1994
CourtQueen's Bench Division

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
21 cases
  • Yorkshire Regional Health Authority v Fairclough Building Ltd
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 1 November 1996
    ...not contemplate that other cases of substitution where that crucial feature is absent should also be included. 81 In Toprak Enerji Sanayi A.S. v. Sale Tilney Technology plc [1994] 1 Ll.R. 303 Judge Diamond Q.C. said merely that the claim brought by the succeeding party, Seniteri, was "clear......
  • Roberts v Gill & Company and Another
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 19 May 2010
    ...The Choko Star seems to be the first case in which it was necessary (because of the wrong turning taken in Toprak Enerji Sanayi AS v Sale Tilney Technology plc [1994] 1 WLR 840) to consider whether the transmission of a pending cause of action had implications under the Limitation Act. Prev......
  • Global Container Lines Ltd v Bonyad Shipping Company [QBD (Comm)]
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Commercial Court)
    • 12 June 1998
    ...Fashions Ltd v Legal and General Assurance Society LtdUNK [1995] BCC 510. Thynne v ThynneELR [1955] P 272. Toprak Enerji Sanayi AS v Sale Tilney Technology plcWLR [1994] 1 WLR 840. Yorkshire Regional Health Authority v Fairclough Building Ltd [1996] CLC 366; [1996] 1 WLR 210. Proceedings — ......
  • Poon Ka Man Jason v Cheng Wai Tao And Others
    • Hong Kong
    • Court of Appeal (Hong Kong)
    • 19 May 2023
    ...made with reference to and for satisfaction of the particular cause of action: Toprak Enerji Sanayi AS v Sale Tilney Technology plc [1994] 1 WLR 840, and should be capable of acceptance by the person in whom the cause of action is vested. The provision in Order 22A rule 2(2) that “payment s......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • A REVIEW OF DEVELOPMENTS IN SELECTED AREAS OF CIVIL PROCEDURE1
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 1996, December 1996
    • 1 December 1996
    ...of Appeal in Yorkshire RHA. Note that the contrary dicta of Judge Diamond QC in Toprak Energi Sanayi AS v Sale Tilney Technology Plc[1994] 1 WLR 840 (indicating that the limitation provisions could apply to rule 7) was rejected by the Mance J in Industrie Chimiche and the Court of Appeal in......