Tower Cabinet Company Ltd v Ingram
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Year | 1949 |
| Date | 1949 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
6 cases
-
ACC Bank Plc v Johnston (t/a Brian Johnston & Company Solicitors) and Others
...PARKINS v CARRUTHERS & ORS 170 ER 604 1800 3 ESP 248 CARTER v WHALLEY & ORS 109 ER 691 1830 1 B & AD 11 TOWER CABINET CO LTD v INGRAM 1949 2 KB 397 1949 1 AER 1033 UNITED BANK OF KUWAIT v HAMMOUD & ORS; CITY TRUST LTD & ANOR v LEVY 1988 1 WLR 1051 1988 3 AER 418 MOLONEY v LIDDY & ORS (T/A H......
-
ACC Bank Plc (plaintiff) v Johnston, Practising under the style and title of Brian Johnson & Company Solicitors (defendant) & Traynor & Mallon (Third parties)
...Pty Ltd v Richardson [1982] AC 462; Parkin v Carruthers 3 Esp NPC 248; Carter v Whalley (1830) 109 ER 691; Tower Cabinet Co Ltd v Ingram [1949] 2 KB 397; United Bank of Kuwait v Hammond [1887] 1 WLR 1051; Moloney v Liddy [2010] IEHC 218, (Unrep, HC, Clarke J, 1/6/2010) and Canole v Redbank ......
-
Lim Hsi-Wei Marc v Orix Capital Ltd and another and another appeal
...is that at the time of those prior dealings, the partner must have been an apparent member of the firm. In Tower Cabinet Co Ld v Ingram [1949] 2 KB 397 at 403, the term “apparent members” has been explained as meaning: members who are apparently members to the person who is dealing with the......
-
Khai Huat Trading (1975) Pte Ltd v Elizabeth Fang Sally and Another
...to note that the duty to give notice in s. 36(1) only applies to ‘apparent members of the old firm’. In Tower Cabinet Co. v Ingram [1949] 2 K.B. 397 at p. 403, Lynskey J observed that in the context of s. 36(1) … "apparent members" means members who are apparently members to the person who ......
Request a trial to view additional results
6 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...v Lester Aldridge LLP [2012] EWCA Civ 35, [2012] 1 WLR 1887, [2012] 2 All ER 1113, [2012] ICR 647 36, 37 Tower Cabinet Co Ltd v Ingram [1949] 2 KB 397, [1949] 1 All ER 1033, [1949] LJR 1419, DC 94 Tower MCashback LLP v HMRC Commissioners [2011] UKSC 19, [2011] 2 AC 457, [2011] 2 WLR 1131, [......
-
Table of Cases
...435 Toronto Star Newspapers Ltd v Canada, 2010 SCC 21 .......................................117 Tower Cabinet Co Ltd v Ingram, [1949] 2 KB 397, [1949] 1 All ER 1033, 65 TLR 407, 93 Sol J 404 ................................................. 62, 64 Tracey v Tracey, 2012 ONSC 3144 (Div Ct)........
-
Case Note
...see H Y Yeo, “Estoppel and the Salaried Partner” (1999) 20 Company Lawyer 292. Either view would cover the facts in Orix Capital. 88 [1949] 2 KB 397 (Div Ct). 89 Tower Cabinet Co Ltd v Ingram [1949] 2 KB 397 at 402 (Div Ct). 90 This is not a requirement under s 14. 91 However, even if the c......
-
Partnerships
...60, a holding out was inferred from the circumstances of the relationship between the parties. 104 Tower Cabinet Co Ltd v Ingram , [1949] 2 KB 397 [ Tower ]. 105 Bet-Mur , above note 95; P e n-Beo Holdings Ltd v Demchuk , 2007 ABQB 282 (QB Master). 106 (1998), 2 WLR 915 (CA). Partnerships 6......
Request a trial to view additional results