Your World of Legal Intelligence
 United Kingdom | +44 (0) 20 7284 8080

Tower Hamlets London Borough Council v Abdi

The Times Law Reports Cited authorities 7 Cited in 6 Precedent Map Related
JurisdictionEngland & Wales
Judgment Date16 September 1992
Date16 September 1992
CourtCourt of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
6 cases
  • Hertfordshire County Council v Bryn Colin Davies
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division
    • 21 Junio 2017
    ...20 HLR 400). There must, however, be a link between the breach of public law which is asserted and a private law right: see Tower Hamlets LBC v Abdi (1992) 25 HLR 80, CA, at p 87, cited with approval by the Court of Appeal in London Borough of Hackney v Lambourne (1993) 25 HLR 172. I must d......
  • London Borough of Hounslow v Alex Adjei
    • United Kingdom
    • Chancery Division
    • 1 Agosto 2003
    ...Council [1983] A.C. 286, 292–293, was a right that could only be asserted in public law proceedings. As Mann L.J. put it in Abdi's case, 25 H.L.R. 80, as analysed by Ralph Gibson L.J. in Lambourne's case, 25 H.L.R. 172, 181, the infringed right, i.e. to suitable accommodation, existed solel......
  • Wandsworth London Borough Council v A
    • United Kingdom
    • Court of Appeal (Civil Division)
    • 21 Diciembre 1999
    ...71 Second, at least Ralph Gibson and Parker LJJ saw themselves as bound by the then recent decision in this court in Tower Hamlets LBC v Abdi (1992) 25 HLR 80. There again a person in temporary accommodation defended possession proceedings by relying on his right to be housed. That right wa......
  • R v The London Borough of Lambeth ex parte Kim Campbell
    • United Kingdom
    • Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
    • 7 Marzo 1994
    ...given no evidence to explain it. Not only this, Mr Wiltshire in his submissions urged me to hold that two authorities, Ali 24 HLR 474 and Abdi 25 HLR 80 supported the proposition that in this case only private law issues were at stake. Yet in reply, at a late stage, he abandoned that submis......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT