Towers & Company Ltd v Gray
| Jurisdiction | England & Wales |
| Date | 1961 |
| Year | 1961 |
| Court | Divisional Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
21 cases
-
Merren v R
...81; 10 C.C.C (2d) 384, considered. (11) R. v. WilliamsUNK(1998), 40 O.R. (3d) 301; 125 C.C.C. (3d) 552. (12) Towers & Co. Ltd. v. Gray, [1961] 2 Q.B. 351; [1961] 2 All E.R 68, followed. Legislation construed: Customs Law (Law 17 of 1990), s.51(a): The relevant terms of this paragraph are se......
-
DPP v Foley
...and said:— "'Possession' is an ambiguous word and one which, as Lord Parker of Waddington observed in Towers & Co. Ltd. v. Gray [1961] 2 Q.B. 351 at 361, is always giving rise to trouble. Its precise meaning must depend on the context and policy of the statute using it and no comprehensive ......
-
R v George Angus McKenzie
...He stated at p. 199:- “’Possession’ is an ambiguous word and one which, as Lord Parker of Waddington observed in Towers & Co Ltd v Gray [1961] 2 QB 351, at 361, is always giving rise to trouble. Its precise meaning must depend on the context and policy of the statute using it, and no compre......
-
Warner v Metropolitan Police Commissioner; R v Warner
...L.C.J. in Oliver v. Goodger [1944] 2 All E.R. 481 at 482 remarked that it was not a term of art. Again, Lord Parker L.C.J. in Towers & Co. Ltd. v. Gray [1961] 2 Q.B. 351 at page 361 after observing that the term "possession" is always giving rise to trouble, and after considering various ......
Request a trial to view additional results